I just hope indexing one extra field isn't gonna be performance issue later.
Ty for your replies.
Erick Erickson wrote:
>
> then you'll need to index another field that records that intention, or
> just "know" which fields are intended to be multiple.
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Sat, Oct 25, 200
then you'll need to index another field that records that intention, or
just "know" which fields are intended to be multiple.
Best
Erick
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 4:12 AM, agatone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yeah but if it happens that for a certain document field1 has only one
> value
> and in
Yeah but if it happens that for a certain document field1 has only one value
and in that case I can't know it is intended as a multiple. in that case
adds.size() would be == 1 and it would look as normal field.
What i need is to mark that field is intended to be multiple no matter if it
contains
No, no, no...
Say you have the following
Document doc = new Document()
doc.add("field1", "stuff", blah, blah)
doc.add("field1", "more stuff", blah, blah)
doc.add("field1", "stuff and nonsense", blah, blah)
IndexWriter.addDocument(doc)
Now, in your search code that document comes up as a hit an
That sounds like abuse of Document.add() :)
Ok, so adding first one extra "empty" value for every field i wish to mark
as multi.
Well if that ain't so wrong, I'll use that :)
Ty
Erick Erickson wrote:
>
> I *think* what you're looking for is Document.getFields(String field),
> which returns
I *think* what you're looking for is Document.getFields(String field),
which returns a list corresponding to every Document.add() you did
originally.
Alternatively, you could always index a companion field that had the
count of times you called Document.add() on a particular field.
Best
Erick
