Re: Lucene in action

Hi Vimal, Indeed I think it is unlikely I have the energy for a 3rd edition ... but anyone can drive the 3rd edition, not just the prior authors. New authors welcome! > Since 2nd edition ( based on lucene 4), I'm sorry to say that 2nd edition is based on Lucene 3.0 not 4! It's even older than

Re: Lucene in action

Nature abhors being anything but an author by name on a second tech book. The ruse is up after one when you have the inputs crystalized and the hourly wage in hand. Hard to find anything but executive producers after that. I’d shoot for a persuasive crowdfunding attempt.

Re: Lucene in Action

downloading step until finish a demo application using > Lucene. > > -Original Message- > From: Ivan Brusic [mailto:i...@brusic.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 11:54 PM > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Lucene in Action > > Hi Jack, sorry if I mi

RE: Lucene in Action

to:i...@brusic.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 11:54 PM To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Lucene in Action Hi Jack, sorry if I missed the part about "but that deal fell through". I met you at Lucene Revolution where you were talking about the book. Too bad, since you c

Re: Lucene in Action

sic > Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 10:41 AM > > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Lucene in Action > > Jack, don't you also have a book coming out on O'Reilly? > > http://shop.oreilly.com/**product/0636920028765.do<http://shop.oreilly.com/prod

Re: Lucene in Action

s are still valid. -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Ivan Brusic Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 10:41 AM To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Lucene in Action Jack, don't you also have a book coming out on O'Reilly? http://shop.oreilly.com/product/063692002

Re: Lucene in Action

ender: "Jack Krupansky" > Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 08:50:39 > To: > Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Lucene in Action > > I would also note that Solr is a great way to start learning Lucene since a > lot of the underlying Lucene concepts are visible in

Re: Lucene in Action

4.3.1 download page. Which file I should download? Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone from Viettel -Original Message- From: "Jack Krupansky" Sender: "Jack Krupansky" Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 08:50:39 To: Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Lucene in Actio

Re: Lucene in Action

-deep-dive-early-access-release-2/ebook/product-21099700.html -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Erick Erickson Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 8:14 AM To: java-user ; dqvin...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Lucene in Action Right, unfortunately, there's nothing that I know of that

Re: Lucene in Action

13 at 11:22 AM, Vinh Dang wrote: > Please try, I am new on Lucene also, and willing to study and share :) > Sent from my BlackBerry(R) smartphone from Viettel > > -Original Message- > From: "Vinh Dang" > Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 15:19:41 > To: > Reply-

Re: Lucene in Action

Please try, I am new on Lucene also, and willing to study and share :) Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone from Viettel -Original Message- From: "Vinh Dang" Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 15:19:41 To: Reply-To: dqvin...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Lucene in Action You have my yesterda

Re: Lucene in Action

You have my yesterday question :) After unzip lucene, you just need to import lucene core. JAR file into your project to use (with eclipse,just drag and drop). Lucene core.jar (I do not remember exact name, but easy to find this jar file) provides core functions of lucene --Original Message

Re: Lucene In Action free chapter on CLucene

You're welcome! One small clarification: it's the section (10.2 -- CLucene) not the whole chapter 10 that's free for downloading... Mike On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko wrote: > Hi, > > > Just to let everyone know Manning have released an extra chapter from the > excellent L

Re: Lucene in Action Rev2

> I've pinged Manning to get this corrected. Thanks for the heads-up. > > Erik No problem. I'm about to order the beta book, and I'm looking forward to the final copy. Thanks for writing it :) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: j

Re: Lucene in Action Rev2

I've pinged Manning to get this corrected. Thanks for the heads-up. Erik On Aug 26, 2009, at 5:58 PM, tsuraan wrote: In the free first chapter of the new Lucene in Action book, it states that it's targetting Lucene 3.0, but on the Manning page for the book, it says the code in the boo

Re: Lucene in Action Rev2

Thanks for spotting that! We'll work with Manning to get it fixed... Yes, we're targeting 3.0 not 2.3 :) Mike On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 5:58 PM, tsuraan wrote: > In the free first chapter of the new Lucene in Action book, it states > that it's targetting Lucene 3.0, but on the Manning page for th

Re: Lucene in Action book. Problems with first example

A follow up message to the one you mention suggests that something be added to the Lucene FAQ and it was, with a link to the 1.9 apidocs which shows the deprecated methods and alternatives. http://lucene.apache.org/java/1_9_1/api/ -- Ian. On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Oleg Oltar wrote: > I

Re: Lucene in Action book. Problems with first example

I am trying to fix my code now. I am using the http://markmail.org/message/4jupw4wnjn3gv7wh Replace all Field.Keyword/UnStored/Text/UnIndexed with the enumerated types, e.g.: - doc.add(Field.Keyword("animal", animal)); + doc.add(new Field("animal", animal, Field.Store.YES, Field.Index.UN_TOKENIZE

Re: Lucene in Action book. Problems with first example

On Dec 16, 2008, at 6:57 AM, Oleg Oltar wrote: Also maybe there are some free manuals/articles that you can recommend for starters? There's a bunch of stuff listed here: Lucene has been changing so rapidly lately that I'm not aware of any

Re: Lucene in Action book. Problems with first example

Also maybe there are some free manuals/articles that you can recommend for starters? On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 1:08 PM, Oleg Oltar wrote: > Thanks!!! > I didn't expect to get such quick answers. Just let me try to fix it :) > > > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 12:56 PM, Erik Hatcher > wrote: > >> >> On

Re: Lucene in Action book. Problems with first example

Thanks!!! I didn't expect to get such quick answers. Just let me try to fix it :) On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 12:56 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote: > > On Dec 16, 2008, at 5:53 AM, Oleg Oltar wrote: > >> So is there another manual which I can use to start? (Seems that examples >> in >> the book, are carefull

Re: Lucene in Action book. Problems with first example

On Dec 16, 2008, at 5:53 AM, Oleg Oltar wrote: So is there another manual which I can use to start? (Seems that examples in the book, are carefully chosen for starters, and quite easy to understand) The API differences are all quite minor to adjust to the latest - hopefully the post I poi

Re: Lucene in Action book. Problems with first example

I posted errors as comments in the provided code.. Yes seems that the version in the book is a little bit old (as the book was created in 2005) So is there another manual which I can use to start? (Seems that examples in the book, are carefully chosen for starters, and quite easy to understand)

Re: Lucene in Action book. Problems with first example

The first edition of Lucene in Action was written for Lucene 1.4. Lots has changed since then in the API, but the fundamentals are still sound. The code can be easily updated to the newer API following the details I posted here: Do note t

Re: Lucene in Action book. Problems with first example

Lucene in Action is based on the 1.4.x release of Lucene, which is quite old by now and unfortunately some of the APIs have since been removed. We are working on the 2nd edition to fix this, but in the mean-time you need to migrate to the new APIs when you see the errors. Eg, if you loo

Re: Lucene in Action book. Problems with first example

Hi, What were the errors? Just a guess ... it may be possible that you are using the wrong lucene version - the one in the book is not the most updated one avbl today "XP is making a bet. It is betting that it is better to do a simple thing today and pay a little more tomorrow to change it if

Re: Lucene in Action

The best place is the Lucene website, including the wiki and the javadocs. Is there something in particular you are interested in? -Grant On Oct 10, 2007, at 4:05 AM, Raghu Ram wrote: Is there any document or book that discusses lucene internal details On 10/10/07, Peter W. <[EMAIL

Re: Lucene in Action

Is there any document or book that discusses lucene internal details On 10/10/07, Peter W. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Cool! > > The quality of first LIA really shined even for > those familiar with Java but new to assertions > and unit tests. Can't wait to buy LIA2... > > Please accept th

Re: Lucene in Action

Cool! The quality of first LIA really shined even for those familiar with Java but new to assertions and unit tests. Can't wait to buy LIA2... Please accept the request to include FieldSelector, QueryWrapperFilter, Lucli, MemoryIndex, MoreLikeThis, Payload, ScoreDoc, TermDocs, ValueSourceQuery,

Re: Lucene in Action

Peter - LIA2 is in progress! :) LIA2IP? Otis (hi Erik! ;)) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Simpy -- http://www.simpy.com/ - Tag - Search - Share - Original Message From: Peter W. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, Octob

Re: Lucene in Action examples complie problem

I wonder if this should be in the FAQ entry "How do i get code written for Lucene 1.4.x to work with Lucene 2.x", Or perhaps just adding there a link to your post here - http://www.nabble.com/Lucene-in-Action-examples-complie-problem-tf2418478.html#a6743189 Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote o

Re: Lucene in Action examples complie problem

I have long been meaning to publish an updated codebase for Lucene in Action compatible with Lucene 2.0. I adjusted the code a while ago, but I haven't published it yet (and I think the plan is to wait until LIA2 is finished to do so). I did make notes when I made these changes, and I'm p

Re: Lucene in Action examples complie problem

Field.Text() was deprecated in Lucene 1.9 and then removed in 2.0. The book examples were not updated for 2.0 yet. You should now use Field(String, String, Field.Store, Field.Index). To have the same behavior as old Field.Text use: Field(name, value, Field.Store.YES, Field.Index.TOKENIZED). For

Re: Lucene In Action Book vs Lucene 2.0

http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/tags/lucene_2_0_0/CHANGES.txt Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > CHANGES.txt is your best source for that answer. > > KEGan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What about the internal of Lucene? Are there any major changes in there? -

Re: Lucene In Action Book vs Lucene 2.0

t; To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 12:33:06 AM Subject: Re: Lucene In Action Book vs Lucene 2.0 Otis, What about the internal of Lucene? Are there any major changes in there? LIA is such a great book. Any date when LIA2 is coming? I definitely must get it :)

Re: Lucene In Action Book vs Lucene 2.0

Otis, What about the internal of Lucene? Are there any major changes in there? LIA is such a great book. Any date when LIA2 is coming? I definitely must get it :) On 9/27/06, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I think you'll find most of the book to still be useful (but then ag

Re: Lucene In Action Book vs Lucene 2.0

Hi, I think you'll find most of the book to still be useful (but then again, I'm the co-author, so maybe I'm not 100% objective). One thing where the API changed is Fields. They are now constructed differently, so the code in the book won't match the current API. We have LIA code working unde

RE: Lucene-In-Action book - any details?..

Thanks, Eric. Vlad -Original Message- From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 11:45 AM To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Lucene-In-Action book - any details?.. Vlad, You're right - LIA 1st edition was written for Lucene 1.4.x. All o

Re: Lucene-In-Action book - any details?..

Vlad, You're right - LIA 1st edition was written for Lucene 1.4.x. All of the code works fine with Lucene 1.9 (with deprecation warnings that can be safely ignored), but documented tweaks are necessary to get the LIA code to compile with Lucene 2.0. The coverage of the basics and archite

Re: Lucene in Action

On Jun 6, 2006, at 4:34 PM, Erick Erickson wrote: Great Googly-Moogly Otis! .. how many blogs do you have? Are you as old as I am or do you just like old Rock-n-Roll? If you're getting this from the Apostrophe/Overnight Sensation album (Frank Zappa), Well, to be petty, it's from Nanook Ru

Re: Lucene in Action

There are about a zillion things that just go whoosh, right over my head in my TV-less state - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Lucene in Action

: > Great Googly-Moogly Otis! .. how many blogs do you have? : Are you as old as I am or do you just like old Rock-n-Roll? If you're : getting this from the Apostrophe/Overnight Sensation album (Frank Zappa), : you can also listen to my all-time favorite song "I'm the slime". Sorry, I was refrenc

Re: Lucene in Action

Great Googly-Moogly Otis! .. how many blogs do you have? Are you as old as I am or do you just like old Rock-n-Roll? If you're getting this from the Apostrophe/Overnight Sensation album (Frank Zappa), you can also listen to my all-time favorite song "I'm the slime". Erick P.S. Haven't owned

Re: Lucene in Action

I find it very useful. I hope you will too. On 6/6/06, digby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Does everyone recommend getting this book? I'm just starting out with Lucene and like to have a book beside me as well as the web / this mailing list, but the book looks quite old now, has a 1-2 month del

Re: Lucene in Action

: v2.0 might be a little while in coming (checkout Otis' blog : http://www.jroller.com/page/otis?catname=%2FLucene). Great Googly-Moogly Otis! .. how many blogs do you have? http://lucenebook.com/blog/ http://www.jroller.com/page/otis http://blog.simpy.com/ -Hoss ---

Re: Lucene in Action

LOL. I gotta get a Lucene License Plate Frame though. Rob Staveley (Tom) wrote: It is better value than the tee shirt http://www.cafepress.com/lucene/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-ma

Re: Lucene in Action

11:55:26 AM Subject: Re: Lucene in Action Thanks everyone, although now I'm not sure what to! Blackwells quicker but more expensive, but is a new edition due...??? Think I'll blow the moths off my wallet and get on with it... [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > It&#

RE: Lucene in Action

It is better value than the tee shirt http://www.cafepress.com/lucene/ smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: Lucene in Action

Grab it now, it is worth all this money. - Original Message From: digby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, 6 June, 2006 11:59:53 AM Subject: Lucene in Action Does everyone recommend getting this book? I'm just starting out with Lucene and like to have a b

Re: Lucene in Action

For what it's worth, Blackwell's uses Lucene for biblio searching. Developed with the help of Lucene In Action. -- Ian. On 6/6/06, digby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks everyone, although now I'm not sure what to! Blackwells quicker but more expensive, but is a new edition due...??? Think

Re: Lucene in Action

Try here.. http://www.abebooks.co.uk Maybe they have one cheaper. Malcolm - Original Message - From: "digby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 11:55 AM Subject: Re: Lucene in Action Thanks everyone, although now I'm not sure what to! B

Re: Lucene in Action

Thanks everyone, although now I'm not sure what to! Blackwells quicker but more expensive, but is a new edition due...??? Think I'll blow the moths off my wallet and get on with it... [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's an invaluable book if you're new to Lucene. There have been some changes to

RE: Lucene in Action

Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 3:49 PM To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Lucene in Action It's an invaluable book if you're new to Lucene. There have been some changes to the Lucene API since the book was published but you shouldn't let this put you off - they're relativ

Re: Lucene in Action

It's an invaluable book if you're new to Lucene. There have been some changes to the Lucene API since the book was published but you shouldn't let this put you off - they're relatively minor. I think Lucene In Action v2.0 might be a little while in coming (checkout Otis' blog http://www.jrolle

Re: Lucene in Action

its a nice book!! On 6/6/06, Irving, Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It really helped me out loads and I would recommend it to anyone. I gave up trying to obtain it from amazon - but got it in 2 days from Blackwell Online (http://bookshop.blackwell.co.uk) > -Original Message- > From

RE: Lucene in Action

It really helped me out loads and I would recommend it to anyone. I gave up trying to obtain it from amazon - but got it in 2 days from Blackwell Online (http://bookshop.blackwell.co.uk) > -Original Message- > From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of digby > Sent: 06 June 2006 11

Re: Lucene in Action

On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 10:59 +0100, digby wrote: > > Does everyone recommend getting this book? If you want to learn Lucene then this is definitely a book to get. > I'm just starting out with Lucene and like to have a book beside me as > well as the web / this mailing list, but the book looks qui

Re: Lucene In Action for lucene 2.0

Otis and I certainly appreciate the interest! And I have been spending some time recently contemplating this effort. A 2nd edition of a book is perhaps the most painful thing to contemplate, even more so than a root canal. With both of us busier than we ever have been, it is a challenge

RE: Lucene In Action for lucene 2.0

I look forward for it also. I even first look forward for LuceneInAction book to get up to date with lucene 2.0. Regards, Jelda > -Original Message- > From: Ernesto De Santis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 2:49 PM > To: Lucene Users List > Subject: Lucene In Act

Re: Lucene in Action in Korean

Hello, Thanks for your announcement in lucenebook.com and java-user list! But the name of our translator Moonho Lee's name is misspelled :) 'ha' should be corrected to 'ho'. Thanks again! On 11/8/05, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > If there are any Koreans (or others dy

Re: Lucene in Action in Korean

Congratulation ! Youngho - Original Message - From: "Otis Gospodnetic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 2:02 PM Subject: Lucene in Action in Korean > Hello, > > If there are any Koreans (or others dying to read a book about Lucene > in Korean), there is no

Re: Lucene in Action : example code -> document-parsing framework ...

Hi, Could somebody please help me regarding Lucene and Digester. I have discovered this problem during indexing the INEX collection of XML for my MSc project. During the parsing of the XML files all named Volume.xml the parser will only index the last XML element in any repetitive list. For ex

Re: Lucene in Action : example code -> document-parsing framework ...

e.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Lucene in Action : example code -> document-parsing framework ... Do you have the log4j.properties file in the classpath? -Original Message- From: Patricio Galeas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 1

Re: Lucene in Action : example code -> document-parsing framework ...

ge- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 October 2005 16:09 To: java-user@lucene.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Lucene in Action : example code -> document-parsing framework ... Do you have the log4j.properties file in the classpath? -Original Message--

RE: Lucene in Action : example code -> document-parsing framework ...

dfparser.BaseParser.(BaseParser.java:70) > > PDFBox cannot find Log4J. You can add Log4J to you classpath to fix > this. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 17 October 2005 16:09 > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org; [EMAIL

RE: Lucene in Action : example code -> document-parsing framework ...

PROTECTED] Sent: 17 October 2005 16:09 To: java-user@lucene.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Lucene in Action : example code -> document-parsing framework ... Do you have the log4j.properties file in the classpath? -Original Message- From: Patricio Galeas <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Lucene in Action : example code -> document-parsing framework ...

Do you have the log4j.properties file in the classpath? -Original Message- From: Patricio Galeas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 15:50:46 +0200 Subject: Lucene in Action : example code -> document-parsing framework ... Hi ALL, I try to run the