Re: Lucene Partition Size

2010-04-12 Thread Ivan Provalov
Thank you, Karl! --- On Fri, 4/9/10, Karl Wettin wrote: > From: Karl Wettin > Subject: Re: Lucene Partition Size > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > Date: Friday, April 9, 2010, 9:39 AM > It's hard for me to say why this is > slow. > > Here are a few more questio

Re: Lucene Partition Size

2010-04-09 Thread Karl Wettin
d via NFS to EMC Celera devices. (NFS 3) - The drives are 300 gb fiber attached with 10,000 rpm. Thanks, Ivan --- On Thu, 4/8/10, Karl Wettin wrote: From: Karl Wettin Subject: Re: Lucene Partition Size To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Date: Thursday, April 8, 2010, 2:44 PM 8 apr 2010 kl.

Re: Lucene Partition Size

2010-04-08 Thread Michael McCandless
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Karl Wettin wrote: > > 8 apr 2010 kl. 20.05 skrev Ivan Provalov: > >> We are using Lucene for searching of 200+ mln documents (periodical >> publications).  Is there any limitation on the size of the Lucene index >> (file size, number of docs, etc...)? > > The only

Re: Lucene Partition Size

2010-04-08 Thread Ivan Provalov
, Karl Wettin wrote: > From: Karl Wettin > Subject: Re: Lucene Partition Size > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > Date: Thursday, April 8, 2010, 2:44 PM > > 8 apr 2010 kl. 20.05 skrev Ivan Provalov: > > > We are using Lucene for searching of 200+ mln > documents (perio

Re: Lucene Partition Size

2010-04-08 Thread Karl Wettin
8 apr 2010 kl. 20.05 skrev Ivan Provalov: We are using Lucene for searching of 200+ mln documents (periodical publications). Is there any limitation on the size of the Lucene index (file size, number of docs, etc...)? The only such limitation in Lucene I'm aware of is Integer.MAX_VALUE