w would this version be published if there are missing jar
> and there are compiling errors?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Steven A Rowe [mailto:sar...@syr.edu]
> Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2011 11:15 PM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Lucene 3.3 in Eclipse
Just curious. How would this version be published if there are missing jar and
there are compiling errors?
-Original Message-
From: Steven A Rowe [mailto:sar...@syr.edu]
Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2011 11:15 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Lucene 3.3 in Eclipse
(Resending to
Original Message-
From: Steven A Rowe [mailto:sar...@syr.edu]
Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2011 11:15 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Lucene 3.3 in Eclipse
(Resending to the list - didn't notice that my reply went to Cheng directly)
There is an Ant target "get-db-jar"
lto:zhoucheng2...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2011 10:48 AM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Cc: Steven A Rowe
> Subject: RE: Lucene 3.3 in Eclipse
>
> Steve, thanks for correction. You are right. The version is 3.0.3
> released last Oct.
>
> I did place an ant
age-
> From: cheng [mailto:zhoucheng2...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2011 4:48 PM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Cc: sar...@syr.edu
> Subject: RE: Lucene 3.3 in Eclipse
>
> Steve, thanks for correction. You are right. The version is 3.0.3 released
> last
> Oc
package, which are
under contrib/db/bdb/src/java folder.
Do you know when I can find the proper jar file?
Cheng
-Original Message-
From: Steven A Rowe [mailto:sar...@syr.edu]
Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2011 10:08 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Lucene 3.3 in Eclipse
Hi Cheng
Hi Cheng,
Lucene 3.3 does not exist - do you mean branches/branch_3x ?
FYI, as of Lucene 3.1, there is an Ant target you can use to setup an Eclipse
project for Lucene/Solr - run this from the top level directory of a full
source tree (including dev-tools/ directory) checked out from Subversio
