Sorry about that. I think II found the diagram you're talking about on page
89.
It even addresses the exact problem I'm talking about.
It's not the first time I've looked like a fool, you'd think I'd be getting
used to it by now .
So, it seems like the most reasonable solution to this issue woul
: I think that's "working as designed". Although I could understand
: someone wanting it to work differently. The slop is sort of like the
: edit distance from the current given phrase, hence the order of terms
: in the phrase matters.
correct ... LIA has a great diagram explaining this ... th
On 3/8/07, Erick Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In a nutshell, reversing the order of the terms in a phrase query can
result in different hit counts. That is, "person place"~3 may return
different results from "place person"~3, depending on the number
of intervening terms.
I think that's "
