15 maj 2008 kl. 09.46 skrev Michael McCandless:
Mark Miller wrote:
Its been months since i've tested this sort of thing, but from what I
remember there is a point where as you go higher, performance
starts to
very slowly drop. The point was lower than I'd expect, and def
created
what look
Mark Miller wrote:
Its been months since i've tested this sort of thing, but from what I
remember there is a point where as you go higher, performance
starts to
very slowly drop. The point was lower than I'd expect, and def created
what looked like sweet spot settings.
This was my recollect
Its been months since i've tested this sort of thing, but from what I
remember there is a point where as you go higher, performance starts to
very slowly drop. The point was lower than I'd expect, and def created
what looked like sweet spot settings.
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 18:36 -0700, Otis Gospodn
Karl, which caches are you referring to? Things like maxBufferedDocs and the
recent memory-based in-memory buffer? If so, isn't "the bigger the better" the
answer?
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Karl Wettin <[EMAIL PROTE
