Re: Index-Format difference between 1.4.3 and 2.0

2006-08-25 Thread Gopikrishnan Subramani
Not sure if it helps, but I have been using Luke (webstart version) from it's website for quite sometime now for inspecting and manipulating my indexes built using Lucene 2.0. I may not be a power user of Luke in that sense, but I haven't found any issues using the basic features. Gopi On 8/25/

Re: Index-Format difference between 1.4.3 and 2.0

2006-08-25 Thread lude
Hi Andrzej, a month ago you mentioned a new Lucene 2.0 compatible Version of luke. Does it exist somewhere? Thanks lude On 7/20/06, Andrzej Bialecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: lude wrote: >> As Luke was release with a Lucene-1.9 > > Where did you get this information? From all I know Lu

Re: Index-Format difference between 1.4.3 and 2.0

2006-07-20 Thread Miles Barr
Andrzej Bialecki wrote: lude wrote: As Luke was release with a Lucene-1.9 Where did you get this information? From all I know Luke is based on Lucene Version 1.4.3. The latest version of Luke was released with an early snapshot of 1.9. I plan to release a 2.0-based version in a f

Re: Index-Format difference between 1.4.3 and 2.0

2006-07-20 Thread Andrzej Bialecki
lude wrote: As Luke was release with a Lucene-1.9 Where did you get this information? From all I know Luke is based on Lucene Version 1.4.3. The latest version of Luke was released with an early snapshot of 1.9. I plan to release a 2.0-based version in a few days. -- Best regards,

Re: Index-Format difference between 1.4.3 and 2.0

2006-07-20 Thread yueyu lin
I'm using Luke to manage Lucene 1.9's index On 7/20/06, lude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As Luke was release with a Lucene-1.9 Where did you get this information? From all I know Luke is based on Lucene Version 1.4.3. On 7/19/06, Nicolas Lalevée <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Le Mercre

Re: Index-Format difference between 1.4.3 and 2.0

2006-07-20 Thread lude
As Luke was release with a Lucene-1.9 Where did you get this information? From all I know Luke is based on Lucene Version 1.4.3. On 7/19/06, Nicolas Lalevée <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Le Mercredi 19 Juillet 2006 12:32, lude a écrit: > Hi Nicolas, > > thanks for answering. > > You wrote:

Re: Index-Format difference between 1.4.3 and 2.0

2006-07-19 Thread Nicolas Lalevée
Le Mercredi 19 Juillet 2006 12:32, lude a écrit : > Hi Nicolas, > > thanks for answering. > > You wrote: > > And about Luke, ASAIK too, is a Lucene-2 app, so it will be able to read > > a > > 1.4 > > What do you mean? > The luke website stated: "Current version is 0.6. It has been released on > 16

Re: Index-Format difference between 1.4.3 and 2.0

2006-07-19 Thread lude
Hi Nicolas, thanks for answering. You wrote: And about Luke, ASAIK too, is a Lucene-2 app, so it will be able to read a 1.4 What do you mean? The luke website stated: "Current version is 0.6. It has been released on 16 Feb 2005." How can Luke be a Lucene-2 application if it was released on F

Re: Index-Format difference between 1.4.3 and 2.0

2006-07-18 Thread kevin
Hi, how to highlight the keyword in the search result summary ? can i use the /highlight/ package? Thanks! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Index-Format difference between 1.4.3 and 2.0

2006-07-18 Thread Nicolas Lalevée
Le Mardi 18 Juillet 2006 20:53, lude a écrit : > Hello, > > sorry, didn't find the information elsewhere: > > 1.) Did the format of the lucene-index change between version 1.4.3 and > 2.0? 2.) Is it possible to use the old Luke-Tool with a new lucene 2 index? > > Thanks > lude ASAIK, the format ch