Doh... Thanks.
Erick Erickson wrote:
>
> I think you misunderstand. The buckets are NOT the votes,
> they are the relevance scores from the search. So your
> search returns relevance scores (raw) from, say 1 - 100.
> You could collect the results in 5 buckets and sort
> by vote *within* the bu
I think you misunderstand. The buckets are NOT the votes,
they are the relevance scores from the search. So your
search returns relevance scores (raw) from, say 1 - 100.
You could collect the results in 5 buckets and sort
by vote *within* the bucket. So the user still sees
the most relevant documen
Well a sort would remove the relevance portion of the query, which I really
don't want to do. I tried using the ValueSourceQuery but it doesn't seem
to be able to handle negative vote values. Buckets sound interesting but
since there is no max voting value it would be difficult to build the max
What would happen if you sorted by vote? Perhaps within ranges
of scores? There's a thread in the list in response to a post I
made about "buckets" that might be relevant
Otherwise, you might think about boosting the relevant
parts of the document at *index* time based on the value
of vote
