k Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Michael McCandless
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 10:39 AM
To: Lucene Users
Subject: Re: Getting position increments directly from the the index
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Igor Shalyminov
wrote:
But, just to clarify, is there a way to get, let
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Igor Shalyminov
wrote:
> But, just to clarify, is there a way to get, let's say, a vector of position
> increments directly from the index, without re-parsing document contents?
Term vectors (as Jack suggested) are one option, but they are very
heavy (slows down
ssage-
From: Michael McCandless
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 6:28 AM
To: Lucene Users
Subject: Re: Getting position increments directly from the the index
Do you actually index the sentence boundary as a token? If so, you
could just get the totalTermFreq of that token?
Mike M
upansky
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael McCandless
> Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 6:28 AM
> To: Lucene Users
> Subject: Re: Getting position increments directly from the the index
>
> Do you actually index the sentence boundary as a token? If so, you
> could j
-Original Message-
From: Michael McCandless
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 6:28 AM
To: Lucene Users
Subject: Re: Getting position increments directly from the the index
Do you actually index the sentence boundary as a token? If so, you
could just get the totalTermFreq of that token?
Mike
Do you actually index the sentence boundary as a token? If so, you
could just get the totalTermFreq of that token?
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Igor Shalyminov
wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I'm storing sentence bounds in the index as position increme
