with FuzzyQuery.
Using FuzzyLikeThisQuery made the relevance much better, so I'm really
happy with the results.
Thank you very much!
>
> Cheers
> Mark
>
>
> - Original Message
> From: László Monda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.or
On Montag, 23. Juni 2008, László Monda wrote:
> According to the current Lucene documentation at
> http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_3_2/api/index.html it seems to me that
> the Query class doesn't have any explain() methods.
It's in the IndexSearcher and it takes a query and a document number as i
ark
- Original Message
From: László Monda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 23 June, 2008 1:11:50 PM
Subject: Re: Getting irrelevant results using fuzzy query
Thanks for your reply, Mark.
This was my original code for constru
ot;Phul", "Saul", and "Paulo" before ANY "Paul" records due to IDF issues.
> Using FuzzyLikeThisQuery puts all the "Paul" records ahead of the variants.
>
>
>
> - Original Message
> From: László Monda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
the variants.
- Original Message
From: László Monda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 23 June, 2008 12:10:05 PM
Subject: Re: Getting irrelevant results using fuzzy query
On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 21:10 +0200, Daniel Naber w
Hi Daniel,
On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 20:37 +0200, Daniel Naber wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 18. Juni 2008, László Monda wrote:
>
> > Since fuzzy searching is based on the Levenshtein distance, the distance
> > between "coldplay" and "coldplay" is 0 and the distance between
> > "coldplay" and "downplay" is 3
Hi Mark,
On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 21:09 +0100, markharw00d wrote:
> This looks like it is related to an issue I first raised here:
> http://markmail.org/message/37ywsemfudpos6uh
>
> At the time I identified 2 issues with FuzzyQuery - that the usual
> "coord" and "idf" scoring factors shouldn't
On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 21:10 +0200, Daniel Naber wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 18. Juni 2008, László Monda wrote:
>
> > Additional info: Lucene seems to do the right thing when only few
> > documents are present, but goes crazy when there is about 1.5 million
> > documents in the index.
>
> Lucene works w
This looks like it is related to an issue I first raised here:
http://markmail.org/message/37ywsemfudpos6uh
At the time I identified 2 issues with FuzzyQuery - that the usual
"coord" and "idf" scoring factors shouldn't be applied to fuzzy queries.
The coord factor got fixed but idf remains a
On Mittwoch, 18. Juni 2008, László Monda wrote:
> Additional info: Lucene seems to do the right thing when only few
> documents are present, but goes crazy when there is about 1.5 million
> documents in the index.
Lucene works well with more documents (currently using it with 9 million).
but the
On Mittwoch, 18. Juni 2008, László Monda wrote:
> Since fuzzy searching is based on the Levenshtein distance, the distance
> between "coldplay" and "coldplay" is 0 and the distance between
> "coldplay" and "downplay" is 3 so how on earth is possible that when
> searching for "coldplay", Lucene ret
11 matches
Mail list logo
