On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
> Todd Benge wrote:
>
>>
>> The intent is to reduce the amount of memory that is held in cache. As it
>> is now, it looks like there is an array of comparators for each index
>> reader. Most of the data in the array appears to be the same for
Todd Benge wrote:
The intent is to reduce the amount of memory that is held in cache. As it
is now, it looks like there is an array of comparators for each index
reader. Most of the data in the array appears to be the same for each cache
so there is duplication for each type ( string, float).
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
> Todd Benge wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been looking into the FieldCache API because of memory problems
>> we've been seeing in our production environment.
>>
>> We use various different sorts so over time the cache builds up and
>> servers stop
Todd Benge wrote:
Hi,
I've been looking into the FieldCache API because of memory problems
we've been seeing in our production environment.
We use various different sorts so over time the cache builds up and
servers stop responding.
I decided to apply the patch for JIRA 831:
https://issues.ap
