Thanks Mike. Yeah, I guess it wouldn't work for us in that case.
Marcos
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 6:00 AM, Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Marcos Juarez Lopez
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for your quick response Mike. I'll be sure to pay mor
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Marcos Juarez Lopez wrote:
> Thanks for your quick response Mike. I'll be sure to pay more attention to
> amount vs quantity in the future :)
Sorry for being pedantic! I've been reading the book "Bugs in
Writing" recently :)
> Just one clarification. I didn'
Thanks for your quick response Mike. I'll be sure to pay more attention to
amount vs quantity in the future :)
Just one clarification. I didn't mention we actually are using phrase and
proximity queries, which I believe use the position information. If that's
the case, is there a way to specify
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Marcos Juarez Lopez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to optimize an index we have, and one thing that has come up
> recently is that we're not really using term frequencies, and we don't need
> any scoring. We noticed that the term frequencies (.doc files) are a
> sign
