Thanks Erick, it looks like we'll have to recreate from the sources ...
Erick Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This just in from the thread
"*Re-created fields consistently indexed"
*Erik Hatcher replied as below, and believe me, Erik knows waay more
about this than I do .
On Aug 30
This just in from the thread "*Re-created fields consistently indexed"
*Erik Hatcher replied as below, and believe me, Erik knows waay more
about this than I do .
On Aug 30, 2006, at 11:07 AM, Jason Polites wrote:
I understand that it is possible to "re-create" fields which are
indexed
Well, assuming you can get all the information you need out of your index,
you really only have two choices that I see.
1> iterate through your documents and delete and re-add each document to
that same index.
2> iterate through your documents and add the doc to a *new* index, then
replace your ol
Thanks, Erick.
I agree that it might be unlikely to reconstruct from an existing index, but I
think document boosting (that is, one document has a higher boost factor than
other documents) as well as field boosting is specified during indexing.
Our use case is performancce/results tuning. We hav
A couple of things..
1> I don't think you set the boost when indexing. You set the boost when
querying, so you don't need to re-index for boosting.
2> A recurring theme is that you can't do an update-in-place for a lucene
document. You might search the mail archive for a discussion of this. The
