Once you open an issues on the spartial / analyzers/cn contribs feel
free to assign me to them.
simon
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
> Cool! I'll be on the case.
>
> Cheers!
>
> Amin
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Simon Willnauer
> wrote:
>>
>> There is a lot
Cool! I'll be on the case.
Cheers!
Amin
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Simon Willnauer <
simon.willna...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> There is a lot of code in /contrib which needs proper documentation,
> refactoring and clean-up.
> For refactoring you can have a quick look at /analyzers/smartcn.
There is a lot of code in /contrib which needs proper documentation,
refactoring and clean-up.
For refactoring you can have a quick look at /analyzers/smartcn.
Clean-up and documentation is needed in /contrib/spartial which still
suffers from lots of legacy comments and certainly legacy code.
I gue
Thanks for your replies. I have checked out trunk and have started looking
at what I can do. Any more suggestions as usual always welcome.
Thanks all!
Amin
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : that you use. Also, we are nearing 2.9 release, so it would
> : be great t
: that you use. Also, we are nearing 2.9 release, so it would
: be great to have as many eyeballs as possible on that. There is a lot of new
: goodness coming in 2.9, so it will be particularly important to get good
: feedback, as this will help set the stage
...even for people that might be re
On Aug 12, 2009, at 5:51 AM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
Hi
I would like to contribute/help in the development of Lucene and I'm
not
sure where to start. I understand Lucene is a mature project with
some
really great contributors and I was wondering whether you can advise
me on
where