Re: Caching of BitSets from filters and Query.equals()

Chris Hostetter wrote: : equals to get q1.equals(q2). The core Lucene Query implementations do override : equals() to satisfy that test, but some of the contrib Query implementations do : not override equals, so you would never see the same Query twice and caching : BitSets for those Query ins

Re: Caching of BitSets from filters and Query.equals()

: equals to get q1.equals(q2). The core Lucene Query implementations do override : equals() to satisfy that test, but some of the contrib Query implementations do : not override equals, so you would never see the same Query twice and caching : BitSets for those Query instances would be a waste

Re: Caching of BitSets from filters and Query.equals()

Chris Hostetter wrote: : I was hoping that Query.equals() would be defined so that equality would be : based on the results that Query generates for a given reader. if query1.equals(query2) then the results of query1 on an indexreader should be identical to the results of query2 on the same inde

Re: Caching of BitSets from filters and Query.equals()

: I was hoping that Query.equals() would be defined so that equality would be : based on the results that Query generates for a given reader. if query1.equals(query2) then the results of query1 on an indexreader should be identical to the results of query2 on the same indexreader ... but there in

Re: Caching of BitSets from filters and Query.equals()

On Mar 6, 2007, at 6:35 AM, Antony Bowesman wrote: Erik Hatcher wrote: Have a look at the CachingWrappingFilter: It caches filters by IndexReader instance. Doesn't that still have the same issu

Re: Caching of BitSets from filters and Query.equals()

Erik Hatcher wrote: Have a look at the CachingWrappingFilter: It caches filters by IndexReader instance. Doesn't that still have the same issue in terms of equality of conditions that created t

Re: Caching of BitSets from filters and Query.equals()

Have a look at the CachingWrappingFilter: It caches filters by IndexReader instance. Erik On Mar 6, 2007, at 2:03 AM, Antony Bowesman wrote: Not sure if I'm going about this the right way,