http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-lucene/LuceneFAQ#head-06fafb5d19e786a50fb3dfb8821a6af9f37aa831
--
Ian.
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 12:26 PM, sandyg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi ALL,
>
> Please can u help how to overcome the exception
> org.apache.lucene.search.BooleanQuery$TooManyClauses: maxCl
First time I tried this I made it WAY more complex than it is
WARNING: this is from an older code base so you may have to tweak
it. Might be 1.9 code
public class WildcardTermFilter
extends Filter {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
protected BitSet
Erick can you please point me to some example of creating a filtered wildcard
query. I have not used filters anytime before. Tried reading but still am
really not able to understand how filters actually work and will help me
getting rid of MaxClause Exception.
Regards,
Ruchika
Erick Eri
See below:
On Dec 1, 2007 1:16 AM, Ruchi Thakur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Erick/John, thank you so much for the reply. I have gone through the
> mailing list u have redirected me to. I know i need to read more, but some
> quick questions. Please bear with me if they appear to be too simple
Erick/John, thank you so much for the reply. I have gone through the mailing
list u have redirected me to. I know i need to read more, but some quick
questions. Please bear with me if they appear to be too simple.
Below is the code snippet of my current search. Also i need to get score inf
John's answer is spot-on. There's a wealth of information in the user group
archives that you should be able to search on discussing ways of providing
the functionality. One thread titled "I just don't get wildcards at all"
is one where the folks who know generously helped me out.
Once you find ou
Hi,
Your problem is that when you do a wildacrd search, Lucene expands the
wildacrd term into all possible terms. So, searching for "stat*"
produces a list of terms like "state", "states", "stating" etc. (It only
uses terms that actually occur in your index, however). These terms are
all adde
Be careful, especially if you have some test data that you're using to prove
things out and only later will you use the "real" (and usually much larger)
data set. There are two problems that I know of with bumping the clauses to
MAX_VALUE.
1> you can run out of memory.
2> it might take a long time
Thanks friends. The problem was solved. I used
BooleanQuery.setMaxClauseCount(Integer.MAX_VALUE) because the value was
really big and so variable that I couldn't determine a consistent top
value.
--
Marim
Supriya Kumar Shyamal disse:
> Normally the default setup for BooleanCluase count is 1024, m
Normally the default setup for BooleanCluase count is 1024, may be your
query produce more query than 1024, one work around is that you set the
BooleanCluase count to more than 1024. You can do that by just invoking
the static method
BooleanQuery.setMaxClauseCount(2048);
supriya
Flávio Marim
On Mittwoch 19 April 2006 22:10, Flávio Marim wrote:
> I am a new Lucene user and I have been searching the group archives but
> couldn't solve the problem.
see
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-lucene/LuceneFAQ#head-06fafb5d19e786a50fb3dfb8821a6af9f37aa831
--
http://www.danielnaber.de
--
: > You mean Theoritically
: > RangeQuery should be forbidden because it always has potential time bomb ?
: > Should we comment it in javadoc ?
In my opinion, the only reason to use RangeQuery is if you are dealing
with very controlled ranges, where you know hte number of terms it will
expand to
Hello,
> >
> > : I upgade to 1.9.1 and reindexing
> > : I used NumberTool when I index the number.
> > :
> > : after upgrade I got following error when number range query.
> > : with query
> >
> > The possibility of a TooManyClauses exception has always existed with
> > RangeQuery and numbers, e
Hello
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Hostetter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lucene Users"
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 3:49 PM
Subject: Re: BooleanQuery$TooManyClauses with 1.9.1 when Number RangeQuery
>
> : I upgade to 1.9.1 and reindexing
> :
: I upgade to 1.9.1 and reindexing
: I used NumberTool when I index the number.
:
: after upgrade I got following error when number range query.
: with query
The possibility of a TooManyClauses exception has always existed with
RangeQuery and numbers, even when using NumberTool. Even if you neve
2500 vs 84. Wow. That's quite a few OR statements I would be saving
following your guide of just indexing the parts of the datetime I plan
to search on. Every ms count.
Now I have a clear picture of how range query works. Great stuff. Thanks.
Btw, coming from a db background I'm so used to wri
On Jul 11, 2005, at 1:45 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did a google serach on the problem when using the range search
phrase of "+datefield:[199801 TO 200512]" (date stored as
"MMDD") which returns 1 million hits.
error: org.apache.lucene.search.BooleanQuery$TooManyClauses
Adding "-Do
17 matches
Mail list logo
