RE: Applying LUCENE-1606 -- which version

2010-01-26 Thread Sriram Muthuswamy Chittathoor
End loop Can I just use this production or need to wait till this is officially released ? -Original Message- From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de] Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 4:00 PM To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: Applying LUCENE-1606 -- which version Hi

Re: Applying LUCENE-1606 -- which version

2010-01-25 Thread Erick Erickson
Two things: 1> please do not start a new subject by replying to an existing e-mail, it's called "thread hijacking". See: http://ubuntuforums.org/archive/index.php/t-181309.html 2> Your request is un-answerable. You've given us absolutely no details of what you're trying to accomplish so we can't h

Re: Applying LUCENE-1606 -- which version

2010-01-24 Thread jyzhou817
Hi, I am planing to integrate Lucene into my web application. Can you please give high level steps to follow? Thanks Zhou --- On Fri, 22/1/10, Sriram Muthuswamy Chittathoor wrote: From: Sriram Muthuswamy Chittathoor Subject: Applying LUCENE-1606 -- which version To: java-user@lucene.apach

Re: Applying LUCENE-1606 -- which version

2010-01-22 Thread Robert Muir
hat would this structure be ?  Is this to be done through Lucene. >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 6:47 PM >> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Applying LUCENE-1606 --

RE: Applying LUCENE-1606 -- which version

2010-01-22 Thread Sriram Muthuswamy Chittathoor
@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Applying LUCENE-1606 -- which version the first step if determining why you really need to support *poker* on 100M database rows, is it some programmers fault, or are users directly typing this in? Either can probably re-trained, perhaps you should do like google, and drop

Re: Applying LUCENE-1606 -- which version

2010-01-22 Thread Robert Muir
t Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 6:47 PM > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Applying LUCENE-1606 -- which version > > the patch won't especially help queries like this. maybe they will be > 5 or 6 times faster, but still slow.

RE: Applying LUCENE-1606 -- which version

2010-01-22 Thread Sriram Muthuswamy Chittathoor
@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Applying LUCENE-1606 -- which version the patch won't especially help queries like this. maybe they will be 5 or 6 times faster, but still slow. if you really want to do such queries, consider this: do you really need * to match an INFINITE amount of characters?!?! I

Re: Applying LUCENE-1606 -- which version

2010-01-22 Thread Robert Muir
t.  I hope this > will suit my needs.   Something like   screenName:*poker* > > > > -Original Message- > From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de] > Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 4:00 PM > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: RE: Applying LUCENE-1606 -- which ve

RE: Applying LUCENE-1606 -- which version

2010-01-22 Thread Sriram Muthuswamy Chittathoor
fast. I hope this will suit my needs. Something like screenName:*poker* -Original Message- From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de] Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 4:00 PM To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: Applying LUCENE-1606 -- which version Hi Sriram, This patch

RE: Applying LUCENE-1606 -- which version

2010-01-22 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi Sriram, This patch cannot be applied to 3.0 as it depends on a new Lucene branch called flex. It depends on features, only added in version 3.1. So it does not even apply on trunk, you have to checkout the experimental flex branch first. For 3.0 you, may try one of the early patches (the las