ah, thanks for the explanation
On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 10:11 AM Adrien Grand wrote:
>
> This is one requirement indeed. Since WAND reasons about partially
> evaluated documents, it also requires that matching one more clause makes
> the overall score higher, which is why we introduced the require
This is one requirement indeed. Since WAND reasons about partially
evaluated documents, it also requires that matching one more clause makes
the overall score higher, which is why we introduced the requirement that
scores must be positive in 8.0. For multiplication, this would require
scores that a
Not advocating any particular approach here, just curious: could BMW
also function in the presence of a doc-score (like recency) that is
multiplied? My vague understanding is that as long as the scoring
formula is monotonic in all of its inputs, and we have block-encoded
the inputs, then we could c
Hello,
You are correct that the contribution would be additive in that case. We
don't provide an easy way to make the contribution multiplicative.
There is some debate about what is the best way to combine BM25 scores with
query-independent features, though in the discussions I've seen
contributi
