nal Message-
> > From: Shai Erera [mailto:ser...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Friday, July 05, 2013 8:25 AM
> > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Accumulating facets over a MultiReader
> >
> > Yes, there are two ways to do that. First, I assume that what you want
Thanks.
Yes, that's the case. I'll try it out.
Is Option 1 more expensive than re-indexing?
> -Original Message-
> From: Shai Erera [mailto:ser...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 05, 2013 8:25 AM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Accumulating
lto:ser...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 11:49 AM
> > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Accumulating facets over a MultiReader
> >
> > What do you mean addDocument()? You re-index it?
> > In that case, when you re-index it, ju
; From: Shai Erera [mailto:ser...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 11:49 AM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Accumulating facets over a MultiReader
>
> What do you mean addDocument()? You re-index it?
> In that case, when you re-index i
> From: Shai Erera [mailto:ser...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 9:02 AM
> > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Accumulating facets over a MultiReader
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > There are a couple of ways you can address that:
&g
ser...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 9:02 AM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Accumulating facets over a MultiReader
>
> Hi
>
> There are a couple of ways you can address that:
>
> Not create an index per-thread, but rather update the glo
il.com]
> > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 8:25 PM
> > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Accumulating facets over a MultiReader
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I assume that you use a single TaxonomyReader instance? It must be the
> same
> > for both index
gt; To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Accumulating facets over a MultiReader
>
> Hi,
>
> I assume that you use a single TaxonomyReader instance? It must be the same
> for both indexes, that is, both indexes must share the same taxonomy index,
> or otherwise their ordin
Hi,
I assume that you use a single TaxonomyReader instance? It must be the same
for both indexes, that is, both indexes must share the same taxonomy index,
or otherwise their ordinals would not match as well as you may hit such
exceptions since one index may have bigger ordinals than what the taxo
