Re: storing pre-analyzed fields

2012-07-11 Thread Michael Sokolov
Uwe - thank you very much for the thorough explanation! -Mike On 7/11/2012 1:14 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote: Hi Mike, The order does not matter at all in all versions of Lucene. You also don't need to subclass AbstractField (but you can use e.g. NumericField as an example); it is enough to use ne

RE: storing pre-analyzed fields

2012-07-10 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi Mike, The order does not matter at all in all versions of Lucene. You also don't need to subclass AbstractField (but you can use e.g. NumericField as an example); it is enough to use new Field(name, TokenStream); if you also want to store this field, simply add a stored-only field with the *sam