In 3.0 nothing changed about that (and also in 2.9). Only that the
FieldCache is now segment-wise which makes IndexReader.reopen be faster.
But you are still able to do your own sorting with own structures, you just
have to write your own TopDocsCollector.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63
PM
> Please respond to
> java-user@lucene.apache.org
>
>
> To
> java-user@lucene.apache.org
> cc
>
> Subject
> Re: Sorting issues
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I can't really help since I've never had to go into the guts of Lucene and
> see where sorting is a
.apache.org
To
java-user@lucene.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: Sorting issues
I can't really help since I've never had to go into the guts of Lucene and
see where sorting is applied, so I don't know where to point you .
But the sorting has always worked for me, and I don&#
; "Erick Erickson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 06/27/2008 12:19 PM
> Please respond to
> java-user@lucene.apache.org
>
>
> To
> java-user@lucene.apache.org
> cc
>
> Subject
> Re: Sorting issues
>
>
>
>
>
>
> That's surprising. Co
respond to
java-user@lucene.apache.org
To
java-user@lucene.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: Sorting issues
That's surprising. Could you post a brief example of your
index and search code?
It sounds like you're saying
docs 1, 2, 3 all have category aaa
docs 4, 5, 6 all have category bbb
docs 7,
That's surprising. Could you post a brief example of your
index and search code?
It sounds like you're saying
docs 1, 2, 3 all have category aaa
docs 4, 5, 6 all have category bbb
docs 7, 8, 9 all have category ccc
But if you search for category:bbb
you don't get docs 4, 5, and 6
Is this a fair
On Freitag 26 Mai 2006 17:46, Mike Richmond wrote:
> I am then storing this in a stored, untokenized field named "date".
From the API docs:
The field must be indexed, but should not be tokenized, and does not need
to be stored (unless you happen to want it back with the rest of your
document d
expecting.
Thanks,
Van Nguyen
Wynne Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: karl wettin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 3:42 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: sorting issues
On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 15:42 -0700, Van Nguyen wrote:
>
> Does anyone hav
stems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: karl wettin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 3:42 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: sorting issues
On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 15:42 -0700, Van Nguyen wrote:
>
> Does anyone have any sorting issues in lucene?
On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 15:42 -0700, Van Nguyen wrote:
>
> Does anyone have any sorting issues in lucene? When lucene is
> returning results from my query, I get results similar to this:
>
> E.D. BULLARD
> E.D. BULLARD
> MINE SAFETY APPL MSA
> NORTH SAFETY PRODUCT
> NORTH SAFETY PRODUCT
> MINE SA
10 matches
Mail list logo
