Re: search performance benchmarks

2006-06-27 Thread heritrix . lucene
post - your feedback is very helpful! Vlad -Original Message- From: Mike Streeton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 2:59 AM To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: search performance benchmarks We recently ran some benchmarks on Linux with 4 xeon cpus and 2gb

RE: search performance benchmarks

2006-06-27 Thread Vladimir Olenin
Message- From: Mike Streeton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 2:59 AM To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: search performance benchmarks We recently ran some benchmarks on Linux with 4 xeon cpus and 2gb of heap (not that this was needed). We managed to easily get 100

RE: search performance benchmarks

2006-06-26 Thread Mike Streeton
represent 1000 connected users. Mike www.ardentia.com the home of NetSearch -Original Message- From: Wang, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 26 June 2006 19:50 To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: search performance benchmarks Performance varies a lot, and depends upon the number

RE: search performance benchmarks

2006-06-26 Thread Wang, Jeff
Performance varies a lot, and depends upon the number of indexes, the number of fields, and the CPU/memory configuration. For myself, a 65Gb source indexed to 1Gb (or so) returns single term queries (oh yeah, the query makeup also matters a lot) in sub seconds on a Intel dual processor (each is 3.