RE: Upgrade lucene from 2.3.2 to 3.1.0

2011-11-14 Thread Zhang, Lisheng
Yes, your point made very good sense, thanks very much for helps! Lisheng -Original Message- From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 5:53 PM To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Upgrade lucene from 2.3.2 to 3.1.0 It's ha

Re: Upgrade lucene from 2.3.2 to 3.1.0

2011-11-14 Thread Erick Erickson
vember 14, 2011 3:20 PM > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: RE: Upgrade lucene from 2.3.2 to 3.1.0 > > >> Thanks for your reply! > > Thanks :-) > >> The reason why we cannot reuse IndexReader is that our server holds many >> (>4000) independent index fold

RE: Upgrade lucene from 2.3.2 to 3.1.0

2011-11-14 Thread Zhang, Lisheng
- From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de] Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 3:20 PM To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: Upgrade lucene from 2.3.2 to 3.1.0 > Thanks for your reply! Thanks :-) > The reason why we cannot reuse IndexReader is that our server holds many > (>4000)

RE: Upgrade lucene from 2.3.2 to 3.1.0

2011-11-14 Thread Uwe Schindler
; From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de] > Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 2:29 PM > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: RE: Upgrade lucene from 2.3.2 to 3.1.0 > > > Hi, > > > We plan to upgrade lucene from 2.3.2 to 3.1.0, from reading "Luc

RE: Upgrade lucene from 2.3.2 to 3.1.0

2011-11-14 Thread Zhang, Lisheng
nks very much for helps! -Original Message- From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de] Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 2:29 PM To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: Upgrade lucene from 2.3.2 to 3.1.0 Hi, > We plan to upgrade lucene from 2.3.2 to 3.1.0, from reading &quo

RE: Upgrade lucene from 2.3.2 to 3.1.0

2011-11-14 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi, > We plan to upgrade lucene from 2.3.2 to 3.1.0, from reading "Lucene In Action" > I learned that we should "warm up" IndexSearcher and donot expect initial a > few queries to be fast. This was always the case, not only since Lucene 2.9/3.0. You should warm your searchers. > But due to our

RE: Upgrade lucene from 2.3.2 to 3.1.0

2011-11-14 Thread Zhang, Lisheng
Thanks very much for reminding, yes, we always rebuild index when upgrading lucene. -Original Message- From: earlh...@gmail.com [mailto:earlh...@gmail.com]On Behalf Of Earl Hood Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 11:54 AM To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Upgrade lucene from

Re: Upgrade lucene from 2.3.2 to 3.1.0

2011-11-14 Thread Earl Hood
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Zhang, Lisheng wrote: > We plan to upgrade lucene from 2.3.2 to 3.1.0, from reading "Lucene In > Action" I learned > that we should "warm up" IndexSearcher and donot expect initial a few queries > to be fast. Make sure to QA things first. When we went from 2.4