RE: TopFieldDocCollector and v3.0.0

2009-12-08 Thread Uwe Schindler
owe [mailto:sar...@syr.edu] > Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 8:42 PM > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: RE: TopFieldDocCollector and v3.0.0 > > Hi Uwe, > > On 12/08/2009 at 9:40 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote: > > After the move to 3.0, you can (but you must not) furth

RE: TopFieldDocCollector and v3.0.0

2009-12-08 Thread Steven A Rowe
Hi Uwe, On 12/08/2009 at 9:40 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote: > After the move to 3.0, you can (but you must not) further update > your code to use generics, which is not really needed but will > remove all compiler warnings. This sounds like you're telling people that although they are able to update

RE: TopFieldDocCollector and v3.0.0

2009-12-08 Thread Uwe Schindler
o: java-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: TopFieldDocCollector and v3.0.0 > > You might want to move to 2.9.1 first, find and fix all the deprecations > and *then* move to 3.x. > > It seems like more work, but it's actually not. Especially if you have > reasonable > unit

Re: TopFieldDocCollector and v3.0.0

2009-12-08 Thread Erick Erickson
You might want to move to 2.9.1 first, find and fix all the deprecations and *then* move to 3.x. It seems like more work, but it's actually not. Especially if you have reasonable unit tests. Since lots of effort has been put into maintaining backwards compatibility in the 2.X versions, 2.9.1 shoul

RE: TopFieldDocCollector and v3.0.0

2009-12-07 Thread Uwe Schindler
That's a java docs issue and already fixed for the 3.0 branch. You have to use the no longer experimental API. Any by the way: Experimental means not "bad" or "functionally unstable", it just means that the API might change on later releases. - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Brem