Re: TermDocs

2013-07-09 Thread lukai
The code snippet you posted is implementation of MatchAllQuery , it only gives you the live doc id in the specified segment. If you want to get extra information about a term, eg. freq, payload, you need to do some calculation. The good thing is FST is sorted, so you can maintain a list of TermsEnu

RE: TermDocs

2013-07-09 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi, > I don't find an elegant solution. reader.termDocs(null) returns AllTermDocs > which doesn't exist in lucene 4.3. > > > I use this piece of code > > Bits liveDocs = reader.getLiveDocs(); > for (int i = 0; i < reader.maxDoc(); ++i) { > if (liveDocs != null && !liveDocs.get(i)

Re: TermDocs

2013-07-08 Thread Yonghui Zhao
I don't find an elegant solution. reader.termDocs(null) returns AllTermDocs which doesn't exist in lucene 4.3. I use this piece of code Bits liveDocs = reader.getLiveDocs(); for (int i = 0; i < reader.maxDoc(); ++i) { if (liveDocs != null && !liveDocs.get(i)) { continue;

Re: TermDocs

2013-07-08 Thread Ian Lea
There's a fair chunk of info on TermDocs and friends in the migration guide. http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_3_1/MIGRATE.html Does that cover your question? -- Ian. On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Yonghui Zhao wrote: > Hi, > > What's proper replacement of "TermDocs termDocs = reader.termDocs

Re: TermDocs

2010-05-14 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On May 12, 2010, at 7:42 PM, roy-lucene-u...@xemaps.com wrote: > Hi guys, > > I've had this code for some time but am just now questioning if it works. > > I have a custom filter that i've been using since Lucene 1.4 to Lucene 2.2.0 > and it essentially builds up a BitSet like so: > > for ( i

Re: termDocs / termEnums performance increase for 2.4.0

2009-02-17 Thread Michael McCandless
It's interesting that you found this speedup... I'm not sure offhand what changes led to the speedup (but I'm still happy about it!). But... why do you need to iterate through all terms, and all docs for each term, in the first place? EG this is what FieldCache does in order to populate v

Re: TermDocs and "read"

2008-10-20 Thread Michael McCandless
It seems like you are trying to use the TermDocs iterator to load the term freq for that particular document (doc)? It doesn't work that way -- instead, it simply iterates over all documents that this term occurred in. (Ie it will replace the doc in the int[] that you passed in, with the

Re: Termdocs question

2008-06-24 Thread Chris Hostetter
: : >termDocs = reader.termDocs(term); : >while(termDocs.next()){ : >int index = termDocs.doc(); : >if(reader.document(index).get("id").equals(id)){ : >reader.deleteDocument(index); : >} : >} :

Re: Termdocs question

2008-06-23 Thread Vinicius Carvalho
I'm sorry, the problem was with the way the id was being indexed. It was marked as tokenized, so I when searched for it's untokenized form I was not getting the doc, now everything works fine :) Regards On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Karl Wettin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 20 jun 2008 kl. 1

Re: Termdocs question

2008-06-21 Thread Karl Wettin
20 jun 2008 kl. 18.12 skrev Vinicius Carvalho: Hello there! I trying to query for a specific document on a efficient way. Hi Vinicius, termDocs = reader.termDocs(term); while(termDocs.next()){ int index = termDocs.doc(); if(reader.docume

Re: Termdocs question

2008-06-20 Thread Erick Erickson
A couple of questions: 1> I assume by "not returning any docs" you mean that you never get into your while loop. Is that true? 2> I'm a little suspicious of the field labeled "id" and whether it's at all possible that this is getting confused with the internal Lucene doc ID. This is a