On Tuesday 23 October 2007 15:57, Dragon Fly wrote:
> I tried specifying the field type using a SortField object but I got the
> same result. I'll be glad to write a stand-alone test case. Should I
> post the code to this thread when I'm done or should I submit some sort
> of bug report? Thanks.
t; To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Sort by date with Lucene 2.2.0 ...
> Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 19:50:46 +0200
>
> On Thursday 18 October 2007 21:35, Dragon Fly wrote:
>
> > I'm am trying to sort a date field in my index but I'm seeing strange
> > resul
On Thursday 18 October 2007 21:35, Dragon Fly wrote:
> I'm am trying to sort a date field in my index but I'm seeing strange
> results. I have searched the Lucene user mail archive for Datetools but
> still couldn't figure out the problem.
It shouldn't make a difference but does it help if you s
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Sort by date with Lucene 2.2.0 ...
>
> Maybe I'm missing something, but that looks like the correct
> order to me, they are both on September 02, 2007, 11:30 P.M, and
> ]24 seconds is before 48 seconds.
&g
Maybe I'm missing something, but that looks like the correct
order to me, they are both on September 02, 2007, 11:30 P.M, and
]24 seconds is before 48 seconds.
Or is it just late and I'm missing the obvious (a specialty of mine)...
Erick
On 10/18/07, Dragon Fly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
