ts we get sometimes. Just trying to see if we could squeeze
> some more cycles out of it.
>
> Thanks for the help.
>
> regards,
>
> Bill Chesky
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 4
l 29, 2009 4:23 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Search result ordering
I really doubt boosting at index time will help. All that expresses is
that "this document's title (say) is more important *when calculating score*
than other documents with a smaller title boost&quo
ry using one of the HitCollectors as you
> suggest to see if it makes a difference.
>
> regards,
>
> --
> Bill Chesky
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 1:46 PM
> To: java-user@lucene.apac
29, 2009 1:46 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Search result ordering
People (including me) use Lucene to page through results all the time,
so I'm pretty sure you're OK.
so here's my answers...
(1) yes.
(2) Well, the default sort is by score so if you want some othe
People (including me) use Lucene to page through results all the time,
so I'm pretty sure you're OK.
so here's my answers...
(1) yes.
(2) Well, the default sort is by score so if you want some other
ordering you have to sort.
(3) You can boost things at index time, but I don't think that's at
