On 6-Nov-07, at 3:02 PM, Paul Elschot wrote:
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 23:14:01 Mike Klaas wrote:
Wait--shouldn't the outer-most BooleanQuery provide most of this
speedup already (since it should be skipTo'ing between the nested
BooleanQueries and the outermost). Is it the indirection and
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 23:14:01 Mike Klaas wrote:
> On 29-Oct-07, at 9:43 AM, Paul Elschot wrote:
> > On Friday 26 October 2007 09:36:58 Ard Schrijvers wrote:
> >> +prop1:a +prop2:b +prop3:c +prop4:d +prop5:e
> >>
> >> is much faster than
> >>
> >> (+(+(+(+prop1:a +prop2:b) +prop3:c) +prop4:d)
On 29-Oct-07, at 9:43 AM, Paul Elschot wrote:
On Friday 26 October 2007 09:36:58 Ard Schrijvers wrote:
+prop1:a +prop2:b +prop3:c +prop4:d +prop5:e
is much faster than
(+(+(+(+prop1:a +prop2:b) +prop3:c) +prop4:d) +prop5:e)
where the second one is a result from BooleanQuery in
BooleanQuery
> On Friday 26 October 2007 09:36:58 Ard Schrijvers wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am seeing that a query with boolean queries in boolean
> queries takes
> > much longer than just a single boolean query when the
> number of hits
> > if fairly large. For example
> >
> > +prop1:a +prop2:b +prop3:c
On Friday 26 October 2007 09:36:58 Ard Schrijvers wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am seeing that a query with boolean queries in boolean queries takes
> much longer than just a single boolean query when the number of hits if
> fairly large. For example
>
> +prop1:a +prop2:b +prop3:c +prop4:d +prop5:e
>
> is
