dexed. Because if this is so then
we still have the problem of doubling the index size.
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 February 2007 19:02
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Search in all fields
Sure. Convert your simple querie
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 February 2007 19:02
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Search in all fields
Sure. Convert your simple queries into span queries (which are also
relatively simple). Then, when you index everything in
Sure. Convert your simple queries into span queries (which are also
relatively simple). Then, when you index everything in the "all" field,
subclass your analyzer to return a large PositionIncrementGap. Explaining
how this works with words is awkward, so
doc.add("all", "one two three");
doc.a
18 jan 2007 kl. 09.54 skrev David:
Hi all:
I study Lucene and I want build search on all the fields, I find
MultiFieldQueryParser can search on multiple fields, but we must
specify
fields. maybe we can add a field named all_field that contain all
the fields
when indexing, but it make t
Here is my experience of getting a good search relevancy: pre processing is
paramount. Pre process your data and using perl is much powerful and flexible
then putting all the logic in a customized analyzer. And if you want to search
multiple fields, create a field called "all" and cat all the
