RE: Real time indexing with RAMDirectory

2005-05-12 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
th minMergeDocs equals to 1 can > be the solution ? > > Thanks, > > Mickaël > > -Message d'origine- > De : Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Envoyé : mercredi 11 mai 2005 21:38 > À : java-user@lucene.apache.org > Objet :

RE: Real time indexing with RAMDirectory

2005-05-12 Thread Rifflard Mickaël
an be the solution ? Thanks, Mickaël -Message d'origine- De : Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : mercredi 11 mai 2005 21:38 À : java-user@lucene.apache.org Objet : RE: Real time indexing with RAMDirectory What happens if you swap the

RE: Real time indexing with RAMDirectory

2005-05-11 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
> (expensive methods I think) ? > > Thanks, > > Mickaël > > > > -Message d'origine- > De : Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Envoyé : mardi 10 mai 2005 17:39 > À : java-user@lucene.apache.org > Objet : Re: Real time indexing wi

RE: Real time indexing with RAMDirectory

2005-05-10 Thread Rifflard Mickaël
the second result without close() or optimize() index (expensive methods I think) ? Thanks, Mickaël -Message d'origine- De : Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : mardi 10 mai 2005 17:39 À : java-user@lucene.apache.org Objet : Re: Real time indexing with RA

Re: Real time indexing with RAMDirectory

2005-05-10 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
Hi Mickaël, Have you tried using minMergeDocs=1 ? Will that do what you want? Otis --- Rifflard Mickaël <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > Is it possible, with the RAMDirectory (or another Directory), to > "flush" informations after each Document indexing ? > I tried this but this "flush