RE: Re: Scale up design

On 12/22/2010 at 2:38 AM, Ganesh wrote: > Any other tips targeting 64 bit? If memory usage is an issue, you might consider using HotSpot's "compressed oops" option:

Re: Re: Scale up design

t; > To: > Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 12:44 PM > Subject: Re: Re: Scale up design > > > There are no noticeable performance gains/loses when moving to 64 bit, > assuming is the exactly same hardware (just 64bit OS), same index and > reasonable amount of java heap >

Re: Re: Scale up design

To: Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 12:44 PM Subject: Re: Re: Scale up design There are no noticeable performance gains/loses when moving to 64 bit, assuming is the exactly same hardware (just 64bit OS), same index and reasonable amount of java heap (keep in mind that if you had 2gb on 32 bit y

Re: Re: Scale up design

ve started > investigating 64 bit,  i want to know about its performance and if anyone in > this group has already tried using it. > > Regards > Ganesh > > - Original Message - > From: "Simon Willnauer" > To: > Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 2:1

Re: Re: Scale up design

anesh - Original Message - From: "Simon Willnauer" To: Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 2:11 PM Subject: Re: Re: Scale up design > On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Ganesh wrote: >> I have done some benchmarking and based on that my estimate of RAM >> requirement

Re: Re: Scale up design

; To: > Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 4:20 PM > Subject: Re: Re: Scale up design > > >> On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 06:59 +0100, Ganesh wrote: >>> 250 GB of data, 40 GB of Index Size, 60 million records is >>> working fine with 1 GB RAM. We are storing minmal amo

Re: Re: Scale up design

ct: Re: Re: Scale up design > On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 06:59 +0100, Ganesh wrote: >> 250 GB of data, 40 GB of Index Size, 60 million records is >> working fine with 1 GB RAM. We are storing minmal amount >> of data in index. We are doing sorting on Date. Even in >>

Re: Re: Scale up design

On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 06:59 +0100, Ganesh wrote: > 250 GB of data, 40 GB of Index Size, 60 million records is > working fine with 1 GB RAM. We are storing minmal amount > of data in index. We are doing sorting on Date. Even in > single system, the database are shard. Looking back in the list, I se

Re: Re: Scale up design

Thanks for your information. My current stats: 250 GB of data, 40 GB of Index Size, 60 million records is working fine with 1 GB RAM. We are storing minmal amount of data in index. We are doing sorting on Date. Even in single system, the database are shard. We are planning to build hosted sol