one possible convention.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Shai Erera [mailto:ser...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 8:53 AM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Partial word match using n-grams
>
> Wait, I didn't mean to pad the entire string.
riginal Message-
> From: Shai Erera [mailto:ser...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 8:53 AM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Partial word match using n-grams
>
> Wait, I didn't mean to pad the entire string. If the string is broken on _
> already
t doesn't have to be an
underscore, that's only one possible convention.
-Original Message-
From: Shai Erera [mailto:ser...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 8:53 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Partial word match using n-grams
Wait, I didn't mean to p
4##" before trigramming is
> not going to produce a to# token that I would need in order for "quota to"
> to match.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Allison, Timothy B. [mailto:talli...@mitre.org]
> Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 7:58 AM
> To: java-user@l
oing
to produce a to# token that I would need in order for "quota to" to match.
-Original Message-
From: Allison, Timothy B. [mailto:talli...@mitre.org]
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 7:58 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Partial word match using n-grams
Got it..
y as if it were a single
term?
From: Becker, Thomas [thomas.bec...@netapp.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 8:59 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Partial word match using n-grams
Thanks for the reply Tim. I really should have been clear
ovice and am not at all sure that
> what I'm doing is optimal. But I have been impressed with how easy it is
> to get something working very quickly!
>
>
> From: Allison, Timothy B. [talli...@mitre.org]
> Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013
nt out that I'm a Lucene novice and am not at all sure that what
I'm doing is optimal. But I have been impressed with how easy it is to get
something working very quickly!
From: Allison, Timothy B. [talli...@mitre.org]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 201
Tommy,
I'm sure that I don't fully understand your use case and your data. Some
thoughts:
1) I assume that fuzzy term search (edit distance <= 2) isn't meeting your
needs or else you wouldn't have gone the ngram route. If fuzzy term search +
phrase/proximity search would meet your needs, se
