Thanks, It works, I took binary jar from Luke site
-Original Message-
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2005 8:25 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: More than 32 required/prohibited clauses in query
On Dec 27, 2005, at 12:38 PM
On Dec 27, 2005, at 12:38 PM, Murali wrote:
On 12/27/05, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There is no officially released 1.9 version yet. Many people are
using the current 1.9 branch for production, however, and it is
stable
(moreso than 1.4.3 IMO).
Why hasn't there been a relea
On 12/27/05, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There is no officially released 1.9 version yet. Many people are
> using the current 1.9 branch for production, however, and it is stable
> (moreso than 1.4.3 IMO).
Why hasn't there been a release since 1.4.3(11/29/04)? Is there a date set
2005 4:52 PM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: More than 32 required/prohibited clauses in query
>
> That's a Lucene 1.4 limitation, gone in the latest 1.9 development
> version.
> If you want to stick with 1.4, try restructuring your query to avoid
> this r
I didn't find a mention about 1.9 version in Lucene site
-Original Message-
From: Yonik Seeley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2005 4:52 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: More than 32 required/prohibited clauses in query
That's a Lucene 1.4
How can I get latest 1.9 development version ?
-Original Message-
From: Yonik Seeley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2005 4:52 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: More than 32 required/prohibited clauses in query
That's a Lucene 1.4 limitation, go
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Yonik Seeley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2005 4:52 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: More than 32 required/prohibited clauses in query
That's a Lucene 1.4 limitation, gone in the latest 1.9 development
versio
That's a Lucene 1.4 limitation, gone in the latest 1.9 development version.
If you want to stick with 1.4, try restructuring your query to avoid
this restriction.
-Yonik
On 12/27/05, Alex Kiselevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I got a strange exception "More than 32 required/prohibited clauses i
