On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> > Uwe, Just re-iterating so that I am understanding your statement right
> > without ambiguity. I use standard analyzer for all english and numerals.
> I
> > don't have a problem when reading 2.3 migrated indices with 4.1, right?
> >
> > Sor
> Uwe, Just re-iterating so that I am understanding your statement right
> without ambiguity. I use standard analyzer for all english and numerals. I
> don't have a problem when reading 2.3 migrated indices with 4.1, right?
>
> Sorry, for the doubt again.
YES!
--
;
>> -
>> Uwe Schindler
>> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>> http://www.thetaphi.de
>> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>>
>>
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de]
>> > Sent: Monday
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de]
> > Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 8:42 AM
> > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: Migrate/Upgrade frommLucene 2.3
> >
> > If you use StandardAnalyzer, you are in tr
2 AM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Migrate/Upgrade frommLucene 2.3
>
> If you use StandardAnalyzer, you are in trouble unless you use
> StandardAnalyzer with Version.LUCENE_23 and you are using non-western
> language. If you change your code to use Version.LUCEN
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> If you use StandardAnalyzer, you are in trouble unless you use
> StandardAnalyzer with Version.LUCENE_23 and you are using non-western
> language. If you change your code to use Version.LUCENE_41, you have to
> reindex.
>
> Thank you Uwe. We
If you use StandardAnalyzer, you are in trouble unless you use StandardAnalyzer
with Version.LUCENE_23 and you are using non-western language. If you change
your code to use Version.LUCENE_41, you have to reindex.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eM
