inal Message-
> From: Shai Erera [mailto:ser...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 3:26 PM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Equality Numeric Query
>
> Thanks a lot for the super fast response !
>
> Shai
>
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 a
> > From: Shai Erera [mailto:ser...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 3:17 PM
> > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Equality Numeric Query
> >
> > Thanks !
> >
> > If I use Yonik's approach, do I need to index
No.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Shai Erera [mailto:ser...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 3:17 PM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: E
Thanks !
If I use Yonik's approach, do I need to index the terms in a special way?
Shai
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Hi Shai,
>
> In 2.9.1, the approach using upper/lower bound identical and included is
> the
> official supported usage. The Query is optimized to rewr
Hi Shai,
In 2.9.1, the approach using upper/lower bound identical and included is the
official supported usage. The Query is optimized to rewrite efficient in
this case (constant score term query).
But you can also use a TermQuery like Yonik suggested and converting the
numbers yourself.
You wil
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Shai Erera wrote:
> I index documents with numeric fields using the new Numeric package. I
> execute two types of queries: range queries (for example, [1 TO 20}) and
> equality queries (for example 24.75). Don't mind the syntax.
>
> Currently, to execute the equali
