RE: Empty search

2007-02-09 Thread Kainth, Sachin
You are right I didn't think about it at all to be honest. -Original Message- From: karl wettin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 February 2007 10:46 To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Empty search 9 feb 2007 kl. 11.34 skrev Kainth, Sachin: > Yep it is the querypar

Re: Empty search

2007-02-09 Thread karl wettin
do nothing then it would return null. And that would just cause another exception. -- karl -Original Message- From: karl wettin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 February 2007 18:05 To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Empty search 8 feb 2007 kl. 18.46 skrev Kainth, Sachin:

RE: Empty search

2007-02-09 Thread Kainth, Sachin
e.org Subject: Re: Empty search 8 feb 2007 kl. 18.46 skrev Kainth, Sachin: > Is it my imagination or does lucene produce an error if you present it > with an empty string to search for? I presume you are referring to the QueryParser? It sounds about right that it would throw an except

Re: Empty search

2007-02-08 Thread Ronnie Kolehmainen
If you are refering to QueryParser, and if you mean that you want Lucene to *find everything* when you actually say *search for nothing*, you could easily extend current Queryparser to suit your needs: public class MyQueryParser extends QueryParser { public MyQueryParser(String f, Analy

Re: Empty search

2007-02-08 Thread karl wettin
8 feb 2007 kl. 18.46 skrev Kainth, Sachin: Is it my imagination or does lucene produce an error if you present it with an empty string to search for? I presume you are referring to the QueryParser? It sounds about right that it would throw an exception at some point if you supplied it an