63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ivan Brusic [mailto:i...@brusic.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2015 3:18 AM
> > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Duplicate values in
day, December 31, 2015 3:18 AM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Duplicate values in search
>
> I potentially found the issue, but I am wondering why the code worked in
> the first place. Did the contract for the scorer change with Lucene 5?
>
> The issue w
To answer partially my question, one key difference is in DefaultBulkScorer:
Lucene 4.10
public boolean score(Collector collector, int max) throws IOException {
...
if (max == DocIdSetIterator.NO_MORE_DOCS) {
scoreAll(collector, scorer);
return false;
}
I potentially found the issue, but I am wondering why the code worked in
the first place. Did the contract for the scorer change with Lucene 5?
The issue was that underneath, each sub scorer had a posting enum and the
initial document was not consumed on the first pass. Inside the
DefaultBulkScor
Thanks Adrien. I added the BaseScorer to the gist, but I was hoping to
achieve was which direction I should go into to debug this issue. I was not
focusing on the scorers since I did not need to upgrade them and I actually
do not think I ever wrote my one Scorer in Lucene. Taking the next few days
Ivan, I can't find the BaseScorer class in the gist. Maybe you forgot to
git add it?
Le lun. 28 déc. 2015 à 23:07, Ivan Brusic a écrit :
> Here is the complete code:
> https://gist.github.com/brusic/e3018a2e403f5707fa3e
>
> The code is not originally mine, so I do not take responsibility. Once I
Here is the complete code:
https://gist.github.com/brusic/e3018a2e403f5707fa3e
The code is not originally mine, so I do not take responsibility. Once I
get things to perform correctly, I will do another pass with improvements.
Much of the custom code needs to be re-thought.
The scorer is one clas
Hi Ivan,
It looks like your scorer is emitting the same document twice. Maybe you
could try to use AssertingIndexSearcher in your test case, this is the kind
of things that it should catch.
The only related Lucene 5 change that I can think of is that Lucene now
requires docs to be collected in or
