son [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 8:19 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Counting term frequency without using Explanation
Before you go too far down this path, please consider what a "hit" is.
It's
more complicated than you think .
If a
to the threads you have mentioned?
Thanks,
Harini
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 8:19 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Counting term frequency without using Explanation
Before you go too far down this
Hi Erick,
Thanks for your help. I found it now . Maybe I will donate an article /
FAQ
regarding this... since many newbies like me asking for things like this.
On 2/7/07, Erick Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Before you go too far down this path, please consider what a "hit" is.
It's
Before you go too far down this path, please consider what a "hit" is. It's
more complicated than you think .
If all you want to do is count up the number of times any term appears in
the document, it's not too hard. You should be able to use a
termenum/termdocs process to count them.
TermDocs s
