Genève 2
> Tél. direct : +41 (0)22 388 00 95
> michel.paw...@etat.ge.ch
>
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Danil ŢORIN [mailto:torin...@gmail.com]
> Envoyé : mardi, 28. septembre 2010 07:57
> À : java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Objet : Re: Questions about Lucene usage
---Message d'origine-
De : Danil ŢORIN [mailto:torin...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : mardi, 28. septembre 2010 07:57
À : java-user@lucene.apache.org
Objet : Re: Questions about Lucene usage recommendations
You said you have 1000 fields...when performing search do you search
in all 1000 fie
seems required :-/
> 12) ok
>
> Regards,
>
> Michel
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Danil ŢORIN [mailto:torin...@gmail.com]
> Envoyé : lundi, 27. septembre 2010 14:53
> À : java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Objet : Re: Questions about Lucene usage recommendations
>
optimized the index the average search
time dropped from 10s to below 2s, now (after 2.5 weeks) the average search
time is 7s. Optimization seems required :-/
12) ok
Regards,
Michel
-Message d'origine-
De : Danil ŢORIN [mailto:torin...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : lundi, 27. septembre 2010 14
Lucene 2.1 is really old...you should be able to migrate to lucene 2.9
without changing your code (almost jar drop-in, but be careful on
analyzers), and there could be huge improvements if you use lucene
properly.
Few questions:
- what does "all data to be indexed is stored in DB fields" mean? you
Hello,
We have an application which is using lucene and we have strong
performance issues (on bad days, some searches take more than 2
minutes). I'm new to the Lucene component, thus I'm not sure Lucene is
correctly used and thus would like to have some information on lucene
usage recommendations.
