Re: QueryParser in 3.x

2010-09-17 Thread Simon Willnauer
ts code duplication. simon > > Scott > > > -Original Message- > From: Simon Willnauer [mailto:simon.willna...@googlemail.com] > Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 1:03 AM > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: QueryParser in 3.x > > On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 1:06 A

RE: QueryParser in 3.x

2010-09-17 Thread Scott Smith
mail.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 1:03 AM To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: QueryParser in 3.x On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 1:06 AM, Scott Smith wrote: > I recently upgraded to Lucene 3.0 and am seeing some new behavior that I > don't understand.  Perhaps someone can e

Re: QueryParser in 3.x

2010-09-17 Thread Simon Willnauer
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 1:06 AM, Scott Smith wrote: > I recently upgraded to Lucene 3.0 and am seeing some new behavior that I > don't understand.  Perhaps someone can explain why. > > > > I have a custom analyzer.  Part of the analyzer uses the AsciiFoldingFilter.   > If I run a word with an uml

QueryParser in 3.x

2010-09-16 Thread Scott Smith
I recently upgraded to Lucene 3.0 and am seeing some new behavior that I don't understand. Perhaps someone can explain why. I have a custom analyzer. Part of the analyzer uses the AsciiFoldingFilter. If I run a word with an umlaut through that analyzer using the AnalyzerDemo code in LIA2,