; Is there any benefit of using one or other for "start with query"?
>>>>
>>>> Which one is faster?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>
>>> It seems that you've answered your own question. If
u've answered your own question. If you want a
"start with
query", this is exactly what a PrefixQuery is for. WildcardQuery
gives you
more flexibility, but if you don't need it, then PrefixQuery should
get the
job done.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble
wn question. If you want a "start with
> query", this is exactly what a PrefixQuery is for. WildcardQuery gives you
> more flexibility, but if you don't need it, then PrefixQuery should get the
> job done.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/P
exactly what a PrefixQuery is for. WildcardQuery gives you
more flexibility, but if you don't need it, then PrefixQuery should get the
job done.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/PrefixQuery-vs-wildcardquery-tp25649045p25649399.html
Sent fro
John Seer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there any benefit of using one or other for "start with query"?
>
> Which one is faster?
>
>
> Regards
>
Prefix query is a bit more efficient - not sure what it turns into
realworld, but prefix just checks if the term's start with the prefix -
wildcard has a bi
Hello,
Is there any benefit of using one or other for "start with query"?
Regards
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/PrefixQuery-vs-wildcardquery-tp25649045p25649045.html
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at
