Kazar
Subject: Re: Potential bug
Dear Folks,-
i have a lot of experience in performance tuning and parallel processing: 17+7
years. So, when you say "you dont know what you ask for", that does not sound
good at all besides i was clear on that.
Alessandro, i appreciate the apology a
, June 14, 2021 8:46 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Cc: Baris Kazar
Subject: Re: Potential bug
+1 to Adrien.
Let's keep the tone neutral.
On Mon, 14 Jun 2021, 16:00 Adrien Grand,
mailto:jpou...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Baris, you called out an insult from Alessandro and your replies sug
ain.
> > > >>
> > > >> Fuzzy search is always expensive but that seems to suit best to my
> > > needs.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks Diego for these great questions and i already explored them.
&
; > >>
> > >> Thanks Diego for these great questions and i already explored them.
> But
> > >> thanks again.
> > >>
> > >> Best regards
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 6/9/21 2:04 PM, Diego Ceccarell
Ceccarelli (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) wrote:
> >>> I have never used fuzzy search but from the documentation it seems very
> >> expensive, and if you do it on 10 terms and 1M documents it seems very
> very
> >> very expensive.
> >>> Are you using the default
you do not use fuzzy
(just to see if is fuzzy the introduce the slow down)?
Or what happens to performance if you do fuzzy with 1, 2, 5 terms
instead of 10?
From: java-user@lucene.apache.org At: 06/09/21 18:56:31To:
java-user@lucene.apache.org, baris.ka...@oracle.com
Subject: Re: Potential bug
to performance if you do fuzzy with 1, 2, 5 terms
instead of 10?
From: java-user@lucene.apache.org At: 06/09/21 18:56:31To:
java-user@lucene.apache.org, baris.ka...@oracle.com
Subject: Re: Potential bug
i cant reveal those details i am very sorry. but it is more than 1
million.
let me tell
java-user@lucene.apache.org At: 06/09/21 18:56:31To:
java-user@lucene.apache.org, baris.ka...@oracle.com
Subject: Re: Potential bug
i cant reveal those details i am very sorry. but it is more than 1
million.
let me tell that i have a lot of code that processes results from lucene
but the b
at parameter?
> >
> > Have you tried to see how the performance change if you do not use fuzzy
> (just to see if is fuzzy the introduce the slow down)?
> > Or what happens to performance if you do fuzzy with 1, 2, 5 terms
> instead of 10?
> >
> >
> > Fr
see if is fuzzy the introduce the slow down)?
Or what happens to performance if you do fuzzy with 1, 2, 5 terms instead of 10?
From: java-user@lucene.apache.org At: 06/09/21 18:56:31To:
java-user@lucene.apache.org, baris.ka...@oracle.com
Subject: Re: Potential bug
i cant reveal those details
java-user@lucene.apache.org, baris.ka...@oracle.com
Subject: Re: Potential bug
i cant reveal those details i am very sorry. but it is more than 1 million.
let me tell that i have a lot of code that processes results from lucene
but the bottle neck is lucene fuzzy search.
Best regards
On 6/9/
you have in the index?
and can you show an example of query?
From: java-user@lucene.apache.org At: 06/09/21 18:33:25To:
java-user@lucene.apache.org, baris.ka...@oracle.com
Subject: Re: Potential bug
i have only two fields one string the other is a number (stored as
string), i guess you cant
How many documents do you have in the index?
and can you show an example of query?
From: java-user@lucene.apache.org At: 06/09/21 18:33:25To:
java-user@lucene.apache.org, baris.ka...@oracle.com
Subject: Re: Potential bug
i have only two fields one string the other is a number (stored as
he.org
Cc: baris.ka...@oracle.com
Subject: Re: Potential bug
Thanks Adrien, but the differences is too far apart.
I think the algorithm needs to be revised.
what if the user needs to limit the search process?
that leaves no control.
there should be a way to speedup lucene then if this is not possi
gards,
Diego
From: java-user@lucene.apache.org At: 06/09/21 18:18:01To:
java-user@lucene.apache.org
Cc: baris.ka...@oracle.com
Subject: Re: Potential bug
Thanks Adrien, but the differences is too far apart.
I think the algorithm needs to be revised.
what if the user needs to limit the search process?
t
ed to only compute
the top 10 hits.
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 7:07 PM wrote:
Hi,-
i think this is a potential bug
i set this time totalHitsThreshold to 10 and i get totalhits reported as
1655 but i get 10 results in total.
I think this suggests that there might be a bug with
TopScoreDocColl
> Hi,-
>
> i think this is a potential bug
>
>
> i set this time totalHitsThreshold to 10 and i get totalhits reported as
> 1655 but i get 10 results in total.
>
> I think this suggests that there might be a bug with
> TopScoreDocColl
Hi,-
i think this is a potential bug
i set this time totalHitsThreshold to 10 and i get totalhits reported as
1655 but i get 10 results in total.
I think this suggests that there might be a bug with
TopScoreDocCollector algorithm.
Best regards
18 matches
Mail list logo
