https://lucene.apache.org/core/8_0_0/core/org/apache/lucene/search/PhraseQuery.html#getSlop--,
writes the following:
For instance, when searching for "quick fox", it is expected that the
difference between the positions of fox and quick is 1. So "a quick brown
fox" would be at an edit distance of
ching query "quick fox"
> against document "the fox is quick".
>
> Edit distance (Levenshtein) is a bit tricky because it might include a
> transposition (just swapping the two words) as edit distance 1 OR 2.
>
> So maybe Lucene's PhraseQuery is counting t
Hello Claude,
Hmm, that is interesting that you see slop=2 matching query "quick fox"
against document "the fox is quick".
Edit distance (Levenshtein) is a bit tricky because it might include a
transposition (just swapping the two words) as edit distance 1 OR 2.
So maybe Luc
ox is quick" would be
at an edit distance of 3;
this seems inaccurate to me.
I don't know if the edit distance used by Lucene is the Levenshtein
distance (insertion, deletion, substitution, all of weight 1) - a standard
in information retrieval - but a test of "quick fox" Phrase
Right, i am getting now expected behavior.
In the docs i wish the New York example would be continued for clarity
and consistence.
Best regards
On 1/24/20 12:55 PM, Atri Sharma wrote:
PhraseQuery enforces the order of terms specified and needs an exact
match of order of terms unless slop is
Thanks for the quick responses, i was having a bug in my code such that
i was building multiple PhraseQuery's instead of one PhraseQuery in a loop.
Then i was losing order of terms.
Best regards
On 1/24/20 12:54 PM, Michael Froh wrote:
Did you check the Javadoc for PhraseQuery.Bu
PhraseQuery enforces the order of terms specified and needs an exact
match of order of terms unless slop is specified.
When appending terms, term pos numbers need to be incremental in the builder
On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 11:15 PM wrote:
>
> Hi,-
>
> how do i enforce the order of
lower position than the previous Term. (That is, Term positions must be
non-decreasing.)
Hope that helps,
Michael
On Fri, 24 Jan 2020 at 09:45, wrote:
> Hi,-
>
> how do i enforce the order of sequence of terms in the PhraseQuery
> builder?
> Lucene docs are very hard to underst
Hi,-
how do i enforce the order of sequence of terms in the PhraseQuery
builder?
Lucene docs are very hard to understand in terms of api descriptions.
https://lucene.apache.org/core/6_5_0/core/org/apache/lucene/search/PhraseQuery.html
Best regards
PhraseQuery can indeed be used to represent a multi-token synonym.
In fact, I mis-spoke before: MultiPhraseQuery can also represent a
multi-token synonym when the multiple tokens are all the same except in one
spot.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 2:32
i should have asked this way as Mike made clear for MultiPhraseQuery:
is PhraseQuery ok to account for synonyms?
Best
> On Sep 20, 2018, at 2:02 PM, baris.ka...@oracle.com wrote:
>
> Hi,-
>
> should i use MultiPhraseQuery or PhraseQuery to take synonyms into account?
&g
Hi,-
should i use MultiPhraseQuery or PhraseQuery to take synonyms into
account?
Best regards
baris
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h
Thanks Mike. I discovered that earlier.
Regards.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/PhraseQuery-tp4299871p4300752.html
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com
PhraseQuery will not work against StringField: that field indexes the
entire string as a single token.
Try running it against the TextField instead?
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 6:52 PM, lukes wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to do phr
(cl, 1);
TopDocs topDocs = indexSearcher.search(mq, 10);
Am i missing something ? Also for PhraseQuery, i should be querying against
StringField, is my assumption right ?
Regards.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/PhraseQuery-tp4299871.htm
re any query similar to BooleanQuery with SHOULD semantics that prefer
> documents where the terms are close to each other?
> I currently use a PhraseQuery with large slop for this. However this only
> works if all the terms are in the document.
>
>
Hi,
Is there any query similar to BooleanQuery with SHOULD semantics that prefer
documents where the terms are close to each other?
I currently use a PhraseQuery with large slop for this. However this only
works if all the terms are in the document.
Best regards,
Erel Uziel
Hi Alan,
thank you, a jira ticket is opened.
Cheers,
Eva
On 18.04.2016 19:01, Alan Woodward wrote:
> Hi Eva,
>
> This looks like a bug in WeightedSpanTermExtractor, which is rewriting your
> PhraseQuery into a SpanNearQuery without checking how many terms there are.
> Could
Hi Eva,
This looks like a bug in WeightedSpanTermExtractor, which is rewriting your
PhraseQuery into a SpanNearQuery without checking how many terms there are.
Could you open a JIRA ticket?
Alan Woodward
www.flax.co.uk
> On 18 Apr 2016, at 16:27, Eva Popenda wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
Hi,
I have a problem when using the Highlighter with N-GramAnalyzer and PhraseQuery:
Searching for a substring with length = N (4 in my case) yields the following
exception:
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Less than 2 subSpans.size():1
at
org.apache.lucene.search.spans.ConjunctionSpans
I got the answer.
Somehow I missed it.
The PhraseQuery requires the terms to be in a fixed order whereas the
BooleanQuery does not require the terms to be
in a particular order.
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Sachin Kulkarni
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using Lucene-5.0.0.
> If I had
Hi,
I am using Lucene-5.0.0.
If I had a qurey "New York" and if I use the BooleanQuery with the
BooleanClause set to MUST on the two terms, is it the same as dong a
PhraseQuery with the two terms?
I am doing some 2-gram type queries and they are giving me different
results with these t
?Hi,
I'm currently migrating from the really old version 3.6 to 4.6. I deleted my
old index and re-indexed everything after migration the whole code base. Now
everything works fine except one thing: My search doesn't return any results as
soon as I add some TermQuery or PhraseQ
If you're looking for a parser, take a look at ComplexPhraseQueryParser or
LUCENE-5205.
From: Uwe Schindler [u...@thetaphi.de]
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 6:32 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: How to use 'PhraseQuery' w
Hi,
You should use a SpanQuery for this use-case. SpanQueries are a generalization
of PhraseQuery. You can include a FuzzyQuery using a MTQ wrapper query into a
span:
SpanNearQuery is the "phrase", consisting of several
"SpanMultiTermQueryWrapper(FuzzyQuery)" nodes.
Be awa
Hello,
Well, I need do a query to locate Phrases like that:
Petruz Augusto
Petruz Auguzto
Petrs Augusto
...
Well, in a single word, I can use fuzzy, but, how I can use it in phrases?
I think that I need use PhraseQuery, but, I never get any result.. (code
below). Thanks
[code]
IndexReader
I think you could express this with TermAutomatonQuery
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5815 ) but it's likely
very slow to run...
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 3:22 AM, Yonghui Zhao wrote:
> Hi，
>
> I want to implement a query like phrase
Might be able to do it with some combination of SpanNearQuery, with
suitable values for slop and inOrder, combined into a BooleanQuery
with setMinimumNumberShouldMatch = number of SpanNearQuery instances -
1.
So, making this up as I go along, you'd have
SpanNearQuery sn1 = B after A, slop 0, in o
Hi，
I want to implement a query like phrase query with slop 0, but I can allow
one term mismatch.
For example, the text is "A B C D E"
I want to match this text with the query "A B C X E".
X mismatches the D.
i.e. Query "A B C D E" will match “W1 W2 W3 W4 W5”, the 5 words are
consecutive
Hi,
Here's my problem, I want to do fuzzy query on "advanced dc motors inc"
which matches to all of the following with close score:
advanced dc motors inc
advanced dc motro incorporation
advanced dc motor 1234 inc
advance dc motor 1234123
And then I have to evaluate automatically whether I found
Dauphin
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2013 4:21 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Why PhraseQuery translate stopwords to "?"
Thanks a lot Jack for this explanation!
I changed the custom query analyzer to avoid incrementing the position of
the subsequent term for each stop word
ra time for each stop word so that
> their positions are maintained.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: Jean-Claude Dauphin
> Sent: Monday, December 09, 2013 4:15 PM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Why PhraseQuery translate stopwords to &quo
: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Why PhraseQuery translate stopwords to "?"
Hi,
My application uses an analyzer with a StopWordFilter. PhraseQuery
translates queries with stopwords by replacing stopwords to "?" characters.
For example, "Java and Lucene" is repla
Hi,
My application uses an analyzer with a StopWordFilter. PhraseQuery
translates queries with stopwords by replacing stopwords to "?" characters.
For example, "Java and Lucene" is replaced by "Java ? Lucene" and "to
contribute" is replaced by "
ew TextField("blurb", "This book is brilliant", Field.Store.YES));
writer.addDocument(doc2);
}
IndexSearcher searcher = new IndexSearcher(DirectoryReader.open(dir));
search(searcher, 1, args[0]);
search(searcher, 5, args[0]);
}
private static void search(I
Hello,
Have a question about default PhraseQuery boost processing. The
Query.setBoost()
<http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_4_0/core/org/apache/lucene/search/Query.html#setBoost(float)>
says:
/
Sets the boost for this query clause to b. Documents matching this clause
will (in addition
See
http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_3_1/queryparser/org/apache/lucene/queryparser/complexPhrase/ComplexPhraseQueryParser.html
From: Ian Lea
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, 27 August 2013, 10:16
Subject: Re: Wildcard in PhraseQuery
See the
See the FAQ:
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ#Can_I_combine_wildcard_and_phrase_search.2C_e.g._.22foo_ba.2A.22.3F
--
Ian.
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 5:11 AM, Chuming Chen wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Can I use wildcard in a phrase query in Lucene/Solr? Can anybody point me
> some directions
Hi All,
Can I use wildcard in a phrase query in Lucene/Solr? Can anybody point me some
directions to look into?
Thanks,
Chuming
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail
@lucene.apache.org
Subject: PhraseQuery Search
Hi,
I have been using the regular Query class to search single keywords. I needed
to include hits such as "BANKER" if the user searched for "BANK". To achieve
this I used "*" on both sides as *BANK*.
Now I need to search f
Hi,
I have been using the regular Query class to search single keywords. I needed
to include hits such as "BANKER" if the user searched for "BANK". To achieve
this I used "*" on both sides as *BANK*.
Now I need to search for phrases and I am building a PhraseQuer
est.
Or, you can file a Jira for a new Lucene Query for phrase and or span
queries that measures distance by offsets rather than positions.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: wgggfiy
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2013 3:47 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PhraseQuery
);
-
--
Email: wuqiu.m...@qq.com
--
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/PhraseQuery-Can-jakarta-apache-10-be-searched-by-offset-tp4061243p4062852.html
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
l: wuqiu.m...@qq.com
--
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/PhraseQuery-Can-jakarta-apache-10-be-searched-by-offset-tp4061243p4061305.html
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
has a begin and end
offset, so it's not just a copy of (Sloppy-)PhraseQuery.
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: wgggfiy [mailto:wuqiu.m...@qq.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 07
isfied the regex
"jakarta.{1,10}apache"
-
--
Email: wuqiu.m...@qq.com
--
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/PhraseQuery-Can-jakarta-apache-10-be-searched-by-offset-tp4061243p4061260.html
Sent from t
gfiy
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2013 11:39 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [PhraseQuery] Can "jakarta apache"~10 be searched by offset ?
As I know, the syntax *"jakarta apache"~10*, which is a PhraseQuery with a
slop=10 in position, but What I want is *based on offset* not o
As I know, the syntax *"jakarta apache"~10*, which is a PhraseQuery with a
slop=10 in position, but What I want is *based on offset* not on position?
Anyone can help me ? thx.
-
--
Email: wuqiu.m...@qq.com
--
--
View this message
: Is it possible to combine Wildcard and Phrasequery for the Queryparser
Hello,
i'm trying to search the following phase:
I'm searching all occurrences of:
. "The Right Way"
. "The Right Ways"
Possible solutions could be something like this
Hello,
i'm trying to search the following phase:
I'm searching all occurrences of:
. "The Right Way"
. "The Right Ways"
Possible solutions could be something like this - combining a phrase &
wildcard search:
. title:"The Right Way*"
. title:"The Ri
advice from this list, I combined 2 separate queries
(the query "+BIG +BEN" and the exact-phrase "\"BIG BEN\"").
But someone suggested an alternative: PhraseQuery with a very large SLOP.
Such SLOP would cover all appearances of theses words in the document
(even far
; > > > > your search phrase : "This is a formal test"
> >> > > > > your setting the slop factor 2 , now if your slop factor is 3 it
> >> > should
> >> > > > > work
> >> > > > > because "is" and &quo
slop factor apart but in your search phrase "This is a formal
>> test"
>> > the
>> > > > > words "This" and "test" are 3 slop factor thats why it's nor
>> working
>> > > > > now in search phrase &quo
working
> > > > > now in search phrase "This is formal test" the words "This" and
> > "test"
> > > > are
> > > > > 2
> > > > > slop factor apart thats why this phrase is working.
> > >
; slop factor apart thats why this phrase is working.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 11:37 AM, a peng
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > >
peng
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I am using StandardAnalyzer(Version.LUCENE_30);
> > > >
> > > > 2010/6/27 tarun sapra
> > > >
> > > > > which analyzer are you usin'?
> > >
using StandardAnalyzer(Version.LUCENE_30);
> > >
> > > 2010/6/27 tarun sapra
> > >
> > > > which analyzer are you usin'?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 7:12 AM, a peng
> > wrote:
> > > >
t;
> > 2010/6/27 tarun sapra
> >
> > > which analyzer are you usin'?
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 7:12 AM, a peng
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I know the indexed content con
7;?
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 7:12 AM, a peng wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I know the indexed content contains the following text: "This is a
> test".
> > > And the search phrase I used is "This is a formal
quot;.
> > And the search phrase I used is "This is a formal test", and then I set
> the
> > slop of the PhraseQuery as 2 with setSlop(2), but I found that I can not
> > get
> > a search result. If I set the search phrase as "This is formal test",
>
which analyzer are you usin'?
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 7:12 AM, a peng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know the indexed content contains the following text: "This is a test".
> And the search phrase I used is "This is a formal test", and then I set the
> slop of the
Hi,
I know the indexed content contains the following text: "This is a test".
And the search phrase I used is "This is a formal test", and then I set the
slop of the PhraseQuery as 2 with setSlop(2), but I found that I can not get
a search result. If I set the search phras
Dear fellow Java developers:
I am reading up on PhraseQuery to search for an exact match for terms that
appear exactly in a particular order for a field (i.e. slop value of 0).
However, I came across SpanNearQuery which appears to work in a similar
fashion, but am confused, due to it&#
> Is there a fundamental difference between
>
> PhraseQuery query = new PhraseQuery();
> query.add(term1, 0);
> query.add(term2, 0);
>
> and
>
> MultiPhraseQuery query = new MultiPhraseQuery();
> query.add( new Term[] { term1, term2 } );
>
> The only di
> I'm having problem with searching phrase and using Surround
> Query Parser, so
> let look at input surround queries (test examples)
> 1. "yellow orange"
> 2. lemon 2n ("yellow orange") 4n banana
> where 2n, 4n are within connectors.
You d
Hello,
I am a bit confused by the two.
Is there a fundamental difference between
PhraseQuery query = new PhraseQuery();
query.add(term1, 0);
query.add(term2, 0);
and
MultiPhraseQuery query = new MultiPhraseQuery();
query.add( new Term[] { term1, term2 } );
The only different I could think of
ge into quotes to let the parser know this
is PhraseQuery, but unfortunately the parser does not support PhraseQuery at
all. Could you please advice some workaround for such situation? How I
should handle such queries to get results from an index? I believe this is
common problem and there already i
unsubscribe
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
ch).do I describe clearly?
for example:Document 1: little boy is running
Document 2:boy is little
when I query "little boy",Document 1 add score 100(Exact match),but
Document 2 add score 0( not Exact match)
- 原文 - 发件人: luocan19826...@sohu.com 主 题: Re: another question about
phrasequery?(th
t exactly match the query(term position
totally match).do I describe clearly?
for example:
Document 1: little boy is runningDocument 2:boy is littleI query "little boy"
Document 1 add score 100(Exact match)Document 2 add score 0( not Exact match)
- 原文 - 发件人: Ian Lea 主 题: Re: an
java-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 7:14:06 PM
Subject: Re: PhraseQuery Performance Issues [Lucene 2.9.0]
Nutch/Solr's CommonGrams is the right way to solve this. It combines
frequent terms (eg stopwords) with adjacent terms. So "the wizard of
oz" will be indexed e
se query
boosted.
--
Ian.
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 2:13 PM, luocanrao wrote:
> I don't think the current phrasequery can meet my requirement.
>
> Can someone help me implement such a phrasequery?
>
>
>
> Exact match document add some score
>
> All other match d
I don't think the current phrasequery can meet my requirement.
Can someone help me implement such a phrasequery?
Exact match document add some score
All other match document add 0 score.(no matter how big slop is)
For example:
Document 1: little boy is running
Document 2:boy is l
Can I have suche a phrasequery.
Exact match document add some score
All other match document add 0 score.
But all the documents that have the terms are valid.
For example:
Document 1: little boy is running
Document 2:boy is little,
I query little boy,
Document 1 add score 100(Exact
Can I have suche a phrasequery.
Exact match document add some score
All other match document add 0 score.
But all the documents that have the terms are valid.
For example:
Document 1: little boy is running
Document 2:boy is little,
I query little boy,
Document 1 add score 100(Exact match
same
term expansion works.
Lucene does no caching that'd speed up PhraseQuery (unless that was
the very first query against the field since you opened the reader) --
this is probably the OS's IO cache.
Mike
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Daniel Shane wrote:
> I'm running a me
I'm running a medium size web search with a index size just shy of 9GB with
80 docs in it.
We are suing Lucene version 2.9.0 (we have not checked yet to see if this
applies to older versions as well).
By looking at my logs, I'm finding that phrase queries are especially long to
perform. In
.add(f);
indexWriter.addDocument(testDocument);
indexWriter.commit();
indexWriter.close();
IndexReader iR = IndexReader.open(ramDirectory);
IndexSearcher indexSearcher = new IndexSearcher(iR);
PhraseQuery query = new PhraseQuery();
upon your needs.
>
> Erick
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 6:50 AM, Avi Rosenschein >wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am using PhraseQuery with explicitly set term positions and slop=0, in
> > order to skip stop words. The field in my index is indexed with
> T
How big is your index? Because the simplest thing would be
to just not remove stopwords at index or query time. Perhaps
in a duplicate field depending upon your needs.
Erick
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 6:50 AM, Avi Rosenschein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using PhraseQuery with explicitly
Hi,
I am using PhraseQuery with explicitly set term positions and slop=0, in
order to skip stop words. The field in my index is indexed with TermVector
positions.
When I do a query with stop words skipped, for example "internet for
research" (translated into PhraseQuery: "inte
Dear fellow Java developers:
Is it possible to do a PhraseQuery when using the XML Query Parser? I
checked the documentation for the XML Query Parser, and it has tags for a
multitude of queries, with PhraseQuery absent from the list. Is it possible
to do a PhraseQuery using the XMLQueryParser
ring). The
analyzed query will then match and retrieve your documents. try to
search :
> PhraseQuery q = new PhraseQuery();
>q.setSlop(1);
>q.add(new Term("title","lucene"));
>q.add(new Term("title","for"));
simon
.
2010/1/5 Mário
Hi,
I need search by phrase containing a particular sequence of terms , then I
am using Java Lucene 3.0, more specifically the PhraseQuery.
I'm using the code below, but does not work(PhraseQuery). Only does work
when I use the QueryParser:
Is there some problem or how can I use the Phrase
@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Edit distance and wildcard searching with PhraseQuery
I'd at use something that lowercases the input rather than just
WhitespaceAnalyzer. Remember to use it at index time and query time.
Between
your queries and typing things in e-mails, case is often a gotcha
ceAnalyzer)?. Have you used it with wildcard
> before?
>
> -Jeff
>
> -Original Message-
> From: AHMET ARSLAN [mailto:iori...@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 5:55 PM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Edit distance
e-
From: AHMET ARSLAN [mailto:iori...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 5:55 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Edit distance and wildcard searching with PhraseQuery
What you are looking for is ComplexPhraseQueryParser [1] and implemented in
Lucene 2.9.0. It uses SpanQuery f
What you are looking for is ComplexPhraseQueryParser [1] and implemented in
Lucene 2.9.0. It uses SpanQuery family.
It supports "Phil* PA"~10 as well as "Philadelphid~0.75 PA".
Ranges, OR, fuzzy and wildcard inside proximity (phrases).
[1]
http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_9_0/api/contrib-misc/o
Hi,
I am trying to figure out a way that I can query a Lucene index for a
phrase but have some fuzziness (edit distance and/or wildcard) applied
to the individual terms. An example should help explain what I am
trying to do:
Index contains:
Philadelphia PA
Search is done on:
Philadel
Yes, the fix in src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/Scorer.java solves
my problem, i.e. the queries return the correct number of results.
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> It sounds likely that this is
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1974
>
> Is it possib
pprox. 30
> million documents) running BooleanQueries containing PhraseQuery does
> not work properly. I've verified this on both optimized and
> unoptimized index versions.
>
> For example:
>
> lucli> count field1:"john doe"
> Searching for: field1:"j
: With the new Lucene 2.9.0 (on a newly built index of approx. 30
: million documents) running BooleanQueries containing PhraseQuery does
: not work properly. I've verified this on both optimized and
: unoptimized index versions.
I suspect that this is the same problem as identified in L
Hello,
With the new Lucene 2.9.0 (on a newly built index of approx. 30
million documents) running BooleanQueries containing PhraseQuery does
not work properly. I've verified this on both optimized and
unoptimized index versions.
For example:
lucli> count field1:"john doe"
Sea
In trying to calculate the cost of various slop settings for phrase
queries, what's the time complexity? O(n) or O(n^2)?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user
hi,
has anyone stumble across this problem where PhraseQuery leads to
incorrect results? In my specific
case PhraseQuery would become equivilent to a set of disjunctive term
queries. However, upon restarting my application (inside tomcat)
PhraseQuery would work again. The logic that produces query
am searching in is [a b c a d e f a b], and my query is [a
>> b],
>> then I want to know where the words [a b] were matched together in the
>> text
>> due to the use of the PhraseQuery/SpanNearQuery ([a b] will get me two
>> occurrences in the documents text).
>>
&
ormation in the text. For example,
if the text I am searching in is [a b c a d e f a b], and my query is [a b],
then I want to know where the words [a b] were matched together in the text
due to the use of the PhraseQuery/SpanNearQuery ([a b] will get me two
occurrences in the documents text).
As fa
b],
then I want to know where the words [a b] were matched together in the text
due to the use of the PhraseQuery/SpanNearQuery ([a b] will get me two
occurrences in the documents text).
As far as I can find out, the highlighter is capable of marking the
individual words causing the hit, but i
On Feb 19, 2009, at 5:54 AM, Nada Mimouni wrote:
Hello,
String ws = " ";
String query = "The"+ws+"president"+ws+"of"+ws+"the"+ws+"USA"+ws
+"is"+ws+""\Barak Obama\"";
Query q = QueryParser.parse(query, new StandardAnalyser());
Query q = QueryParser.parse(query, new WhitespaceAnalyser());
Hello,
String ws = " ";
String query =
"The"+ws+"president"+ws+"of"+ws+"the"+ws+"USA"+ws+"is"+ws+""\Barak Obama\"";
Query q = QueryParser.parse(query, new StandardAnalyser());
Query q = QueryParser.parse(query, new WhitespaceAnalyser());
In this example:
- could we create a query in such a fo
1 - 100 of 208 matches
Mail list logo
