linearly with the data. After a very few docs, adding,
> say, 1M of data does not cause the data to grow by 1M (or
> even close to that) for fields that are NOT stored. I've
> learned to just trust that the very bright people who work
> on Lucene have "done the right thing"
Ganesh - yahoo wrote:
Hello all,
Documents coressponding to multiple users are to be indexed. Each user is
going to search only his documents. Only Administrator could search all users
data.
Is it good to have one database for each User or to have only one database
for all Users? Which will be
I'd start out with one index, if for no other reason
than keeping track of one index for each user would
be a royal pain in the neck. You haven't told us
how many users or documents you expect,
so that's just a guess. There's one answer perhaps
if you wind up with a 10M index, another if it's 10T..
Hello all,
Documents coressponding to multiple users are to be indexed. Each user is going
to search only his documents. Only Administrator could search all users data.
Is it good to have one database for each User or to have only one database for
all Users? Which will be better?
My opinion i
