one possible convention.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Shai Erera [mailto:ser...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 8:53 AM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Partial word match using n-grams
>
> Wait, I didn't mean to pad the entire string.
riginal Message-
> From: Shai Erera [mailto:ser...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 8:53 AM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Partial word match using n-grams
>
> Wait, I didn't mean to pad the entire string. If the string is broken on _
> already
t doesn't have to be an
underscore, that's only one possible convention.
-Original Message-
From: Shai Erera [mailto:ser...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 8:53 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Partial word match using n-grams
Wait, I didn't mean to p
4##" before trigramming is
> not going to produce a to# token that I would need in order for "quota to"
> to match.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Allison, Timothy B. [mailto:talli...@mitre.org]
> Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 7:58 AM
> To: java-user@l
oing
to produce a to# token that I would need in order for "quota to" to match.
-Original Message-
From: Allison, Timothy B. [mailto:talli...@mitre.org]
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 7:58 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Partial word match using n-grams
Got it..
y as if it were a single
term?
From: Becker, Thomas [thomas.bec...@netapp.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 8:59 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Partial word match using n-grams
Thanks for the reply Tim. I really should have been clear
ovice and am not at all sure that
> what I'm doing is optimal. But I have been impressed with how easy it is
> to get something working very quickly!
>
>
> From: Allison, Timothy B. [talli...@mitre.org]
> Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013
nt out that I'm a Lucene novice and am not at all sure that what
I'm doing is optimal. But I have been impressed with how easy it is to get
something working very quickly!
From: Allison, Timothy B. [talli...@mitre.org]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 201
..@netapp.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 3:55 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Partial word match using n-grams
One of our main use-cases for search is to find objects based on partial name
matches. I've implemented this using n-grams and it works pretty well.
However we&
One of our main use-cases for search is to find objects based on partial name
matches. I've implemented this using n-grams and it works pretty well.
However we're currently using trigrams and that causes an interesting problem
when searching for things like "abc ab" since we first split on whi
Hi Hanu,
Depending on the nature of the partial word match you're looking for - do you
want to only match partial words that match at the beginning of the word? - you
should look either at NGramTokenFilter or EdgeNGramTokenFilter:
<http://lucene.apache.org/core/old_versioned_docs/
Is it possible to match partial words using Lucene. we are using Standard
Analyzer for tokenization.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Partial-word-match-tp3896450p3896450.html
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com
12 matches
Mail list logo
