Re: Numerical fields

2007-05-11 Thread Chris Hostetter
: I know that usually one has to index such fields as text with : the property a > b => lex(text(a)) > lex(text(b)) and devise : the text(n) transformation appropriately. : : What I'm looking for is an enhancement which would eliminate : the a -> text(a) transformation or simplify it. Is it nece

Re: Numerical fields

2007-05-11 Thread Doron Cohen
karl wettin wrote: > > 11 maj 2007 kl. 18.16 skrev Stadler Hans-Christian: > > > Is there an enhancment/plugin to Lucene which would allow > > queries like > > > > myNumericalField > 100 > > FunctionQuery might be what you are looking for. > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-446 LUCEN

Re: Numerical fields

2007-05-11 Thread karl wettin
11 maj 2007 kl. 18.16 skrev Stadler Hans-Christian: Is there an enhancment/plugin to Lucene which would allow queries like myNumericalField > 100 FunctionQuery might be what you are looking for. http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-446 -- karl --

Numerical fields

2007-05-11 Thread Stadler Hans-Christian
ent allready that simplifz the treatment of numerical fields. HC - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Lucene and numerical fields search

2005-07-19 Thread Ray Tsang
trightforward to modify this for filtering numeric ranges. If your > > numbers > > > are stored as zero padded Strings then you should be able to leave > > the > > > bits() method as is otherwise you might have to put some String to > > number > > > conversion in th

Re: Lucene and numerical fields search

2005-07-19 Thread Andrew Boyd
I second the motion. It sounds like a good solution to TooManyClauses exception. -Original Message- From: Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Jul 16, 2005 5:59 PM To: java-user@lucene.apache.org, Ray Tsang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Lucene and numerical field

Re: Lucene and numerical fields search

2005-07-16 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
gt; > Rifflard Mickaël > > > @atosorigin.com> > To > > > > > 12/07/2005 09:31 >

Re: Lucene and numerical fields search

2005-07-12 Thread Ray Tsang
> 12/07/2005 09:31 cc > > Subject > Please respond to RE: Lucene and numerical fields > [EMAIL PROTECTED] search &

Re: Lucene and numerical fields search

2005-07-12 Thread Yonik Seeley
I use ConstantScoreRangeQuery for this purpose: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34673 -Yonik On 7/12/05, Rifflard Mickaël <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm using Lucene as a fulltext search engine since a year now and this one > works well for this. > Now, I want t

RE: Lucene and numerical fields search

2005-07-12 Thread Paul . Illingworth
Subject Please respond to RE: Lucene and numerical fields [EMAIL PROTECTED] search apache.org

RE: Lucene and numerical fields search

2005-07-12 Thread Rifflard Mickaël
12 juillet 2005 10:16 À : java-user@lucene.apache.org Objet : Re: Lucene and numerical fields search I have similar requirements. To get around the "Too many clauses" problem I am creating a Filter (this takes one or two seconds to create on an index of around 25 documents)

Re: Lucene and numerical fields search

2005-07-12 Thread Paul . Illingworth
Subject Please respond to Lucene and numerical fields search [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Lucene and numerical fields search

2005-07-12 Thread Rifflard Mickaël
Hi all, I'm using Lucene as a fulltext search engine since a year now and this one works well for this. Now, I want to add to my application search capability like : aField greater than 10 , aField between 10 and 20. For this, I used RangeQuery (aField:[10 TO 20] for exemple) and I received all