gt;
> > public NumericField(String name)
> >
> > Creates a field for numeric values using the default precisionStep
> > NumericUtils.PRECISION_STEP_DEFAULT (4). The instance is not yet
> > initialized with a numeric value, before indexing a document
> > containin
ou
> > > miss some stored fields? E.g. the default NumericField ctor does not
> > > create the field as “stored” to the document?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > public NumericField(String name)
> > >
> > > Creates a field for numeric value
ricUtils.PRECISION_STEP_DEFAULT (4). The instance is not yet
> > initialized with a numeric value, before indexing a document
> > containing this field, set a value using the various set???Value()
> > methods. This constructor creates an indexed, but not stored field.
> >
> &
. This constructor creates an indexed, but not stored field.
>
>
>
> Uwe
>
>
>
> -
>
> Uwe Schindler
>
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>
> http://www.thetaphi.de
>
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
>
>
>
>
> > -
field.
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Todd Nine [mailto:t...@spidertracks.co.nz]
> Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 6:13 AM
> To: java-user@lucene.apac
Hi all,
I'm having some issues with Numeric Range queries not working as
expected. My underlying storage medium is the Lucandra index reader and
writer, so I'm not sure if this is an issue within Lucandra or with my
usage of numeric field. My numeric range tests that are copies of Uwe's
pass in
