Trejkaz [mailto:trej...@trypticon.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 6:33 AM
> To: Lucene Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: MultiFields#getTerms docs clarification
>
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 8:23 PM, Michael McCandless
> wrote:
> > Seems like you need to scrutinize ex
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 8:23 PM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> Seems like you need to scrutinize exactly what documents were indexed in step
> 3?
>
> How exactly did you copy documents out of the old index? Note that
> when Lucene's IndexReader returns a Document, it's not the same
> Document that
Seems like you need to scrutinize exactly what documents were indexed in step 3?
How exactly did you copy documents out of the old index? Note that
when Lucene's IndexReader returns a Document, it's not the same
Document that was indexed in the first place: it will only have fields
that were stor
Updating this with newly-obtained info.
1. The original index was created in Lucene 3.x. In 3.x, if I call
getMin(), it returns non-empty values. So far so good.
2. The index then gets migrated to 5.x using multiple IndexUpgrader
steps. Now, when I call getMin(), it still returns a non-empty valu
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 11:51 PM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> Getting an empty BytesRef back from Terms.getMin() means Lucene thinks you
> indexed an empty (zero length) token. Lucene (unfortunately) allows this.
> Is it possible you did that?
>
> If not, can you make a test case showing this?
I
Getting an empty BytesRef back from Terms.getMin() means Lucene thinks you
indexed an empty (zero length) token. Lucene (unfortunately) allows this.
Is it possible you did that?
If not, can you make a test case showing this?
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 a
For type null I added a field with byte ref with a empty byte array. Maybe
it will resolve ?
Il 12/ago/2016 11:57 "Trejkaz" ha scritto:
> Hi all.
>
> The docs on MultiFields#getTerms state:
>
> > This method may return null if the field does not exist.
>
> Does this mean:
>
> (a) The method *w
Hi all.
The docs on MultiFields#getTerms state:
> This method may return null if the field does not exist.
Does this mean:
(a) The method *will* return null if the field does not exist.
(b) The method will *not necessarily* return null if the field does not exist.
I think we've seen a sit
