: Subject: MultiFieldQueryParser question
: Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 14:53:37 -
: Message-ID:
: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#threadhijack
Thread Hijacking on Mailing Lists
When starting a new discussion on a mailing
d.
I discovered this by using Luke to inspect the documents.
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell, Erica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 February 2008 14:54
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: MultiFieldQueryParser question
Hi,
I'm trying to build up an index of fi
Hi,
I'm trying to build up an index of fields to represent an
org.eclipse.emf.ecore.EObject;
So I'm adding these fields to my lucene doc
doc.add(new Field(NAME, cls.getName(), Field.Store.YES,
Field.Index.TOKENIZED));
doc.add(new Field(IDENTITY, obj.eGet(cls.getEIDAttribute()).toString(),
Fiel
other MultiFieldQueryParser question...
I'll try Luke.
Something is definitely not right because if your explanation of
UNTOKENIZED is correct - and I believe it is - then my searches using
the exact text with matching casing should have returned results.
-Original Message-
From: Erick Ericks
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 8:01 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Another MultiFieldQueryParser question...
UN_TOKENIZED fields are indexed "as is", without going through an
analyzer.
What that means is
1> no casing is done.
2> multi-word values are stored j
e is that I have a numeric field
that is untokenized and that does not require the wrapper.
Jiho
-Original Message-
From: Doron Cohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 2:46 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Another MultiFieldQueryParser question...
"Jiho
eally confuses me is that I have a numeric field
that is untokenized and that does not require the wrapper.
Jiho
-Original Message-
From: Doron Cohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 2:46 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Another MultiFieldQueryParser que
"Jiho Han" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 15/01/2007 10:50:14:
> I looked through the archive a bit and found some Q & A's regarding this
> but I didn't see anything definitive so I thought I'd ask again...
>
> Basically, I have a web page that can search through a database table
> across multiple s
I looked through the archive a bit and found some Q & A's regarding this
but I didn't see anything definitive so I thought I'd ask again...
Basically, I have a web page that can search through a database table
across multiple servers.
So imagine that there are 100 different databases spread across
