:
http://www.nabble.com/Multi-language-indexing-tf3702402.html#a10372286
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
bhecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/05/2007 10:26:27:
> I have implemented my own analyzer for each country.
> So as I see it, when I index these records, I want to
> provide lucene, with a specific analyzer per record
> i'm indexing.
>
> When a user performs a query in my JSF form, I will
> us
ry entered ni a search, I will use the non stemming
analyzer.
Am I going the right direction?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Multi-language-indexing-tf3702402.html#a10361747
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archiv
7 maj 2007 kl. 15.45 skrev bhecht:
OK, thanks, I think I got it.
Just to see if I understood correctly:
When I do the search on both stemmed and unstemmed fields, I will
do the
following:
1) If I know the country of the requested search - I will use the
stemmed
analyzer, and then the
field
might not be found.
Am I correct?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Multi-language-indexing-tf3702402.html#a10357611
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---
7 maj 2007 kl. 13.27 skrev bhecht:
The last option seems to be the right one for me, using a stemmed and
unstemmed field.
I assume when you mean "unstemmed", you mean indexing the field
using the
UN_TOKENIZED parameter.
No, I mean TOKENIZED, but not using a stemmer analyzer.
--
karl
Search", which allows only 1 analyzer to be defined.
Thanks, I will post my problem now in the Hibernate search forum.
Good day.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Multi-language-indexing-tf3702402.html#a10355770
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list a
7 maj 2007 kl. 12.16 skrev bhecht:
My question regarding "the way to go", was if it is a good solution
to index
a content of a table, using more than 1 analyzer, determining the
analyzer
by the country value of each record.
I'm not sure what you mean, but I'll try.
Do you ask if it makes
scribes exactly my problem, and I just want to
be sure this is how people with Lucene
expiriance would have approached this problem.
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Multi-language-indexing-tf3702402.html#a10354930
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archiv
7 maj 2007 kl. 10.02 skrev bhecht:
This means I index and search using the same analyzer.
I was interested to know if this is the way to go?
That would be the way to go (unless you are really sure what you're
doing).
--
karl
--
rding to a specific value in a record to be
indexed.
Before I break my head understanding how this can be implemented, I wanted
to know if this approach is correct?
Thanks in advance.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Multi-language-indexing-tf3702402.html#a10353549
Sent from
11 matches
Mail list logo
